Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- From: Duncan <dunxuk@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 05:43:41 -0700
On 13 Jun, 21:50, Roadie <hjs...@xxxxxx> wrote:
On Jun 13, 1:48 am, sim...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Duncan Ross (from Scotland) wrote a very entertaining comparison of
theDE1121and DE1103:http://simart.googlepages.com/de1121de1103.htm
Worth a read!
--
Art Simon
sim...@xxxxxxxxxxxx://art.simon.tripod.comhttp://www.myspace.com/artsimon
Thanks for posting. After reading it I'm at a complete loss as to why
the author chose theDE1121over the DE1103 unless he was looking for
a way to satisfy "masochistic tendencies".
Hi Roadie!
I chose the DE1121 because on a crowded band like 49m it outperforms
the DE1103, makes unattended recordings and the RDS-esque way that
station names appear as you tune into them while browsing regardless
of band is a sockdologer.
And I'm a masochist.
Best regards,
Duncan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- From: Roadie
- Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- References:
- Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- From: simart
- Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- From: Roadie
- Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- Prev by Date: Re: Lowe receiver repair
- Next by Date: Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- Next by thread: Re: Performance review: DE1121 vs. DE1103
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|