Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: "Brenda Ann" <brendad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 12:35:42 +0900
"Eric F. Richards" <efricha@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7fetc21ngu79uibp3is1ffr5042ectkehk@xxxxxxxxxx
"Stephanie Weil" <stephanienyc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
Several weeks ago, she said she was going to complain to my ISP and get
me
denied service. She was very specific, and the message is filed.
Maybe someone posing as her? It's not unheard of. I've had people
tell me that they've received viruses and attacks from who knows who
using my email address. But everything is clean.
It's easy to spoof email addresses, I think.
Very easy -- but it was her who said SOMETHING like that -- as usual,
Mr. Gleason is distorting reality to fit his adgenda:
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 07:58:09 +0900
Message-ID: <e96j1i$su0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
David, *** OFF! I don't generally use foul language, but you bring it
out
in me. And that ain't good. You keep saying nobody is listening. Well,
you
are then calling everyone in this NG, and tens-to-hundreds of thousands
of
people across the US, and hundreds-of-thousands to MILLIONS in Canada,
Mexico and the Caribbean "nobody". We take great offense to that. I
consider
your IBOC shilling SPAM, and if you continue with it on this NG, I will
personally mount a campaign to have you releaved of your internet access.
WE
DON'T WANT TO HEAR IT! Not the shilling, and not the QRM. GO AWAY!
So what she clearly says, in exasperation, is, "IF you don't stop
SPAMming us, I will do something about it." Not hard to understand,
is it?
Absolutely.. And I am fully within my rights (and even obligations) to mount
a campaign against someone SPAMMING the newsgroup. SPAMMING is against the
law. And David Eduardo Frackleton Gleason... you are SPAMMING in a newsgroup
that doesn't want to (continue to) hear it. A few posts regarding your
opinion on IBOC are fine. No problem with that. BUT, you have gone far
beyond that, and have been consistantly and agressively harassing this
newsgroup and minimalizing and marginalizing people in this newsgroup.
There are others that have used innuendo, racism, ad hominem in posts
answering you. I won't do that, don't believe in it. But you (speaking still
of DEFG) know by this time that your continued pushing of the subject has
not been welcome for some time, yet you keep it up. Just because I and
others don't want to hear it anymore doesn't mean we are ostriches, it means
you have worn out YOUR welcome.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- References:
- DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: sidwellfriends
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: Stephanie Weil
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: David Eduardo
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: Stephanie Weil
- Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- From: Eric F . Richards
- DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Dallas Lankford article on synch detectors
- Next by Date: Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- Previous by thread: Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- Next by thread: Re: DE's flaming remarks about Brenda Ann on radio-info.com HD board
- Index(es):
Loading