Re: HD article from Radio World


"Steve" <sdaniel13@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153190980.946449.143750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" <sdaniel13@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1153176700.326940.310010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Whatever. I can't imagine what motivates you to post this crap here.
You know you aren't going to sell us on IBOC, so why waste your time?

It realtes to DX as HD uses specturm. It also shows that there is a lot
of
sentiment for it in radio, and it is unlikely it will go away. There was
noting like this support for AM stereo...


But no one in this group cares. No one is interested in what you have
to say, so why bother?

Actually, some are. I have even received e-mails on the subject from readers
of the group.

If you are not interested in the subject, you are, like DXass, playing
ostrich. You may not like what I post, so ignore my postings. But HD is
going to be on most of the viable AMs in the US in a few years.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: HD article from Radio World
    ... You know you aren't going to sell us on IBOC, so why waste your time? ... It realtes to DX as HD uses specturm. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)
  • Re: HD article from Radio World
    ... You know you aren't going to sell us on IBOC, so why waste your time? ... It realtes to DX as HD uses specturm. ...
    (rec.radio.shortwave)