Re: 31 M band very poor
- From: mzenier@xxxxxxxxxx (Mark Zenier)
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 17:37:41 GMT
In article <4305D6BF.C221E904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
dxAce <dxAce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>David wrote:
>
>> BBCWS-Singapore 9740 unlistenable
>
>About S5 here, a slight delay from 15190. Australia is booming in on 9580.
How do 9580 and 9590 compare? Usually I get a bit stronger signal
on 9590, but the audio has some digital crap in it.
I think 9580 is one of RA's transmitters at Sheperton (sp?), and
9590 is one of the Christian operated ones at Darwin.
Mark Zenier mzenier@xxxxxxxxxx
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)
.
- References:
- 31 M band very poor
- From: David
- Re: 31 M band very poor
- From: dxAce
- 31 M band very poor
- Prev by Date: Re: Cindy Sheehan; "This country is not worth dying for."
- Next by Date: Re: OT Patrick J. Buchanan Sees the Light
- Previous by thread: Re: 31 M band very poor
- Next by thread: Re: 31 M band very poor
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|