Re: good long distance radio
- From: "Alex Clayton" <alexx1400@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 21:55:29 -0800
"Al Klein" <rukbat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7nbu22tidsj0g27jgf4dpfoel2ookinqk1@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:22:35 -0800, "Alex Clayton"
<alexx1400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Al Klein" <rukbat@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p7kr229tvia3fvtsptr7atp95eva1g09ot@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 19:22:58 -0800, "Alex Clayton"
<alexx1400@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Now I'm sure some experts here will tell everyone that they
can't do that
I'm just telling what I've seen with my 5 watt, 450 MHz radios under
various conditions. My degrees work for many miles and never need
recharging, but they don't help communications a bit.
Sorry about your pain, though.
Don't know, as I said my knowledge of radios and scanners is pretty
limited.
But you don't mind sharing your opinion with others. Others who know
less than you do, and may actually accept your opinion as being worth
something - then waste their money.
You're correct though - no one should accept what they read on the
internet as being worth more than the pixels it's made of - you proved
that.
ROTFLMAO!!
Touched a nerve there huh? Well I'm sure your Mom is still impressed with
you Al. You just keep telling the world how smart you are, after all you
believe it. It's a shame if anyone spends money on what I use only to find
out it works, while you being much smarter can tell them why what they have
should not work.
--
Stupidity should be painful
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: good long distance radio
- From: Al Klein
- Re: good long distance radio
- References:
- Re: good long distance radio
- From: Al Klein
- Re: good long distance radio
- From: Alex Clayton
- Re: good long distance radio
- From: Al Klein
- Re: good long distance radio
- Prev by Date: Re: good long distance radio
- Next by Date: swldatabase
- Previous by thread: Re: good long distance radio
- Next by thread: Re: good long distance radio
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|