Concerning N9OGL
- From: "Not Dloyd" <anon@anon>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 21:19:12 -0500
"an_old_friend" <kb9rqz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:27d4ad7a-d9ed-40df-b00a-9cfcfcb59fce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Feb 15, 5:04 pm, Stagger Lee <S...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 12:04:07 -0800 (PST), an_old_friend <kb9...@xxxxxxxxx>yes
wrote:
where is he on the record RRAP is NOT under oath for example neither
is QRZ
Go back and reread the original post.
It said that several people had warnedI still don't see much risk of anythign happening to todd
Todd that he was at risk of an enforcement action, and that Todd had
denied he
was at risk.
In fact, Todd was denying that the basic laws of electromagnetic
radiation applied to Omega One.
never saw him say anything of the kind
And now we know the rest of the story. Todd is in possession of two love
letters from the FCC, and my warning has come to pass
and the letter are going where
either RH has a metter reading over the line or not
since no NAL has been issued my guess is RH has not got the goods
a little care and Todd walks away wining thw encounter which he
invited
Toodd can say anything he wants about power levele are you claiming if
I state I am uysing 4 kw on the ham bands right now I am going to lose
my license. if you are you are nuts
.........
This isn't about you, Mark. We know you need, nay....DEMAND the attention,
but this is about Todd, not you.
I see that you are still lying about the loss of your first blog to Dloyd
when you say,
"this blog was first mine then I lost control of it during the conversation
to the new blooger it was finaly taken back by me"
It was NOT taken back by you, unless you consider your whining and begging
and Dloyd's ultimate generosity in giving it back to you as "taking" it
back.
In a loose sense, you did "take" it back, but only after it was relinquished
to you out of sheer pity.
I'm sure that Dloyd now regrets having felt sorry for you.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- dloyd's hijacked thread
- From: an_old_friend
- dloyd's hijacked thread
- References:
- Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- From: Dave Heil
- Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- From: Stagger Lee
- Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- From: an_old_friend
- Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- Prev by Date: Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- Next by Date: dloyd's hijacked thread
- Previous by thread: Re: Concerning N9OGL (from today's ARRL Letter)
- Next by thread: dloyd's hijacked thread
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|