Re: Dloyd the staker back for more

On 27 Mar 2007 20:07:45 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" <DloydLavies@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Mar 27, 10:38?pm, M...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 19:22:28 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" <DloydLav...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On Mar 27, 10:03?pm, M...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 27 Mar 2007 19:01:38 -0700, "Dloyd Lavies" <DloydLav...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Mar 27, 9:38?pm, M...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
would you consider doing a favor and point out what this is at some
point? I am mild curious from an acedemic PoV

Not at this time,

I see 7ith go for it

BTW did anyone disabuse you of the ntion that merely mentioning your
chosen nickname on USENET is not a criminal act

I know that Mark............

then you were lying when you claimed that my mentioning your name was
stalking you in violation of Michigan stalking laws

That is not what I claimed,.......
yes you demanded I stop posting your Nick on my blog USE your blog...
It was along with...
..........what I claimed was your continued posting
to my blog implying that you were going to cause me harm, after I had
told you to stop posting is a violation of Michigan law.

you claimed that too

One of the
parameters of Michigan anti-stalking laws is you have to make it clear
that you have demanded the party to STOP the harrassing behavior.

which you continue to persist in your harrasing behavoir

I
have clearly asked you to stop the behavior yet you persisted, in
violation of your own states law.

I have enaged in NO harrasing behavoir you have and you refuse to
desit from it

you expressly invited to respond to your libel by making it



............., but I believe that the terms that you used in
indicating your intent to carry out my death were excessive.

possiblly but I don't. nor does my friend the sheriff here but
analysing the rresult of various senarios is not an expression of
intent you reading are really poor Dloyd

No, I think your writing skills are also not the best.

never claimed they were the best

indeeed I have often conceed they are not the best

none the less you seem unable to procoess indivual words corectly




and You realy expect any milage out of posting a fake death threat on
your blog?

I did not know it was fake.

did not know? does this mean you NOW know it is fake.

I am willing to take your word.

frankly I am shocked you have not receieved dozens of such emailI have
received at least 40 of them claiming to be from from YOU promising my
death at your hands

I have never e-mailed you.


again your poor reading skil shows through

I never said you did I neer impleied you

You may find this hard to believe but I do
have standards. As far as your wifes account is concerned I never
hacked into anything,.......

so you say at this point I do not believe you

...... all of the information came up on a routine
search on google,......

so you say given other actions occouring in the same time frame I
don't believe you

that you admited it was done to harm me your statement that you "
lashed out" simply inflamed the matter further

that you determeined that the file had been delete is evedence that
you were closely watching MY wife online activities after being told
to stay away from accounts and her life ammounts to all the prooff I
need to be convinced peronally of your criminal intent, as to wether
your actions will convince LE time will tell

......... if anything I would be mad at Amazon for not
securing the information if you deemed it so personal.

I am not telling them that, my wife is.

such things are part and parcel of the stalker that seek to provoke
combat on RRAP for their entertainment

I agree.


a faction that you are either part of or a tool of

I am nethier a part of or a tool,

you are not in psotion to know

everything I have posted has been on
my own accord in response from what I percieve is attacks/harrassment
by you.

and mine have been in response to your actions attack harrassment
imporper efoorts I preceieve on your part to disrupt RRAP such as you
efforts to promote the new Moderated NG over RRAP and RRAM

amoug your dmenads as I see them is that I not interfere with what I
see as your efforts to further harm these NG's and therfore a
perfectly legit target


you disagree it seems but your opinion does not govern mine


omeone emailed that to me through
blogger at my gmail account and it appeared to have came from one of
your valid email addresses.

again the question stands do you now accept it as a fraud?

I will have to take your word if you deny sending the email, it is
still in my gmail account.

I do sugest you retain it in any case wether you believe me or not


s you know there are many forgers on
here, you even have one post on your blog that did not come from me
(the one that said you will never catch me), but there always will be
people who want to inflame a situation if they can.

not sure which you are referring to I do recall clearing a post
perporting to you that I added a further sugesting I belived it likely
a forgery

I also submit you have alose admitted you know there are many forgers
trying to inflame RRAP

Indeed that is one reason I can never acced to your stated demand that
refrain from replying to your posts since if I agreed to such I rather
suspect every one of the RRAP forgers would suddenly be "Dloyd Lavies"
and I could not post any replies at all

I agree, but attacking me at will .......

you are impling I need your premission to attack your posts I do not
need your permission or aproval

.......is something that I will not sustain
for your entertaiment purposes.

again you presume to know MY motives

I attack no one and nothing for my entertaiment

your staement is an attack on my character and therfore by the
standards you have sought to hold me would justify my attacking your
personal private life that of your family and freinds "lashing out"
at you


another being I often don't look at who is posting but resrict my
comentary to meat of the post

But can you conceed that renaming every thread is not really
accomplishing anything,..........

no I can not becuase it is not the case IMO or rather I could lie and
agree with that statement but I choose not to

nor do I rename every thread some days yes it does work out that way
some day such as today it does not

............. it only makes the NG hard to read for people
like me who read directly through google,.........

It makes the nature of the threads corupted by the filth mongers
imposible to sort though

and thereby unreadable

....... I would never subscribe too
much spam.

thus you cnceed the efectiness of the technique

that has been efective was demontrated to RRAP By Steve Robeson with
the diruptive "More Markie (then Morkie) Mulakie" posts I then studing
his technques learned to exploit to to counter him and final drive him
largely away from the NG, an act jsufied by hsi staus as someone that
posted alomst nothing but sexaul indeno

the NG has been slowly recovering from those days complicated by Steve
poping in and psoting 'encouragement' to the filth mongers


thrid of course being Principle as I see it any demand I refrain
excerising my free speech right esp by means of a threat as you is
extrotionate attack on my civil rights

But also under the same principle, I should also have the right to
post without being deluged with boilerplate posts that state "stalking
thread" or woger this or dloyd that.

why?

I don't have that right why do you claim it for yourself

you have the right to post and no one has the right to blackmail in
not posting, no one has any duty to stand by and say nothing in
response

If you accept the email as fraud I demen that either remove at once,

I will remove the email, if in fact it is fraud but of course I am
maintaining a copy in my email for possible future reference.

as you should

I point you have critized ME for posting MY bleiefs without prove this
is also as I recal from blog entries I read but did not preserve part
of your greivance with Lloyd that Did not prov e his claims pior to
making them or something along those lines

yet you felt free to post on YOUR blog something you seem have admited
you can not prove is truely my email yet you posted it as another
attack

why do you have that that right not I or for that matter not Lloyd
Davies?


No more posting tonight CU

honestly I hope not, do read that carefully I would rather never see
you or your posts again. I have the rright to my preferences




http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com
stealing data from my wifes accounts is unaccaptable
Dloyd Lavies renagade cyber theif and terroist

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Are you now, or have you ever been, a troll?
    ... Posting 100 lines of excuses about Democrats doesn't ... issues than you will ever be so quit making shit up to attack me. ... Just the pink that's emblematic of cowardly anarchists like you who burn ... sarcasm your way. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • RE: Trace of 139 attack?
    ... Subject: Trace of 139 attack? ... The Administrator account can be locked out if too many ... deleting the logs he cannot do it. ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)
  • Re: Valid password characters
    ... A good password policy should be combined with a good user name ditto. ... whereby an account would be disabled after a certain of unsuccessful ... The attack on this type of protection will not be a frontal attack ... without even the implied warranty of merchantability ...
    (microsoft.public.inetserver.asp.db)
  • Re: Mark Probert Has NO Job!
    ... >> I notice that Richard H Jacobson is still posting this, ... Richard H Jacobson did not post it! ... Just WHERE did Debbee attack DC? ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • RE: Trace of 139 attack?
    ... Subject: Trace of 139 attack? ... I think passprop allows you to lock the admin account via the network not on ... on your IIS server & as got the command prompt. ... > deleting the logs he cannot do it. ...
    (Focus-Microsoft)