Re: dumb advice to Todd
- From: "K4YZ" <k4yz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Jan 2006 06:30:20 -0800
N9OGL wrote:
> >That portrays prepubescent characters participating in adult-like
> >sex acts.
>
> The problem is though, the vast majority of Anime Characters that are
> out there (and there is a LOT) look as though they are underaged. there
> is really nothing in anime to determine how old an anime character is...(SNIP)
Rationalization, Toiddie. Pure rationalization.
High pitched voices, immature reactions. Child-like mannerisms.
Now tell me again about determining the "age" of your "characters"
> > I get if FROM you, including the 2 billion times you've used the
> >"F" word in reference to FAA and FCC personnel. I also have several
> >posts of yours wherein you suggested local LE personnel were ####ing
> >idiots, along with several other socially disrespectful things to say
> >about them.
>
> First off I don't remember using the F word when it came to the FAA...(SNIP)
Guess you have the same sobriety and memory issues that Markie
does.
> (UNSNIP)...now the FCC, that I would vouch for...and the FCC is well aware of how
> I think of them, long before you. As for local Law Enforcement you'll
> have to refresh my memory. The Vast majority of the time on these
> newsgroups I'm bashing one group....I take it back three groups, The
> FCC, ARRL and the NAB. I've also been known to throw punches at the
> RIAA and MPAA.
Most of which are due to each of those agencies expecting you to
play by the same rules everyone else does and act your age.
Obvioulsy a deficiency of your upbrining.
> > I don't need to prove anything.
>
> The point is steve I have the right to get on here and bash a
> government agency, that is protected by the Constitution.
Our Forefathers created these documents not to give citizens a
forum to "bash" anyone, but to put checks and balances on those powers
that men tend to corrupt.
You're just acting like a third grade brat who isn't getting to
play instead of do his homework.
> Second
> without actually proof that I did what I said I did on here then it
> basically falls under the same category as here say which is NOT
> uphold-able in a court of law.
It's archived, Toiddie.
Case law has already substantiated the validity of entering these
records into court proceedings.
> That's why the FCC wouldn't do ####,
> unless they have actually proof that I'm doing something illegal they
> aren't going to do anything same-thing with FAA unless they have
> actually proof that I was fly they can't do ####. you have to have
> actual evidence to prove that I violated Federal Law.
We have YOUR admission that you're operating an illegally modified
ultralight in Google archives.
> >YOU are the one who bragged about flying an illegally modified
> >ultralight.
>
> Bragging about doing something dose not necessary mean he did it.
But you've since admitted you've "been flying".
Busted. By your own words.
Steve, K4YZ
.
- References:
- advice to Todd
- From: kb9rqz
- Re: dumb advice to Todd
- From: K4YZ
- Re: dumb advice to Todd
- From: N9OGL
- Re: dumb advice to Todd
- From: K4YZ
- Re: dumb advice to Todd
- From: N9OGL
- advice to Todd
- Prev by Date: Re: Tood's board is hardcore all right
- Next by Date: Re: dumb advice to Todd
- Previous by thread: Re: dumb advice to Todd
- Next by thread: Re: dumb advice to Todd
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|