Re: OT or is it on topic?
- From: kb9rqz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:50:51 -0500
On 30 Jan 2006 15:19:33 -0800, hot-ham-and-cheese@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>N7ZZT - Eric Oyen wrote:
>> well well well...
>>
>> it seems that after my filter got done with this group, only 15 postings of
>> the estimated 6000 in the last month alone rated as relevant (to
>> rec.radio.amateur.POLICY).
>>
>> of the rest, it devolved into: backstabbing, name calling, accusations of
>> child porn or other illegal activities and various other non-relevant junk.
>>
>> is anyone going to discuss any REAL policy issues dealing with Amateur
>> radio?
>>
>> --
>> DE N7ZZT
>> Eric Oyen
>> Phoenix, Arizona
>> e-mail: n7zzt(at)hotmail(dot)com
>> the difference between intelligence and stupidity is that intelligence
>> has its limits.
>
>Well, well, well...
>
>It seems Eric missed the posting wrt the FCC claiming to define Morse
>Code.
>
>Thanks for participating.
like I said the man doesn't discuss anything just advocates a crypto
fasist thinking the FCC is always right
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT or is it on topic?
- From: N7ZZT - Eric Oyen
- Re: OT or is it on topic?
- References:
- OT or is it on topic?
- From: N7ZZT - Eric Oyen
- Re: OT or is it on topic?
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- OT or is it on topic?
- Prev by Date: Re: OT or is it on topic?
- Next by Date: Re: interesting chat with the FCC today
- Previous by thread: Re: OT or is it on topic?
- Next by thread: Re: OT or is it on topic?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
