Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: "K4YZ" <k4yz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Jan 2006 19:14:45 -0800
hot-ham-and-cheese@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> K4YZ wrote:
> > hot-ham-and-cheese@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > K4YZ wrote:
> > > > hot-ham-and-cheese@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > > Tom B wrote:
> > > > > > It is a sad thing to watch, but it is also time that Mark be stopped.
> > > > >
> > > > > How could you possibly know???
> > > >
> > > > Uhhhhhhhhh....By having to wade through all the profanity-laden
> > > > subject lines and the over 800+ posts Markie has now accumulated in a
> > > > 30 day period.
> > >
> > > You admit that Mark can out-###hole you.
> >
> > Of course he can.
>
> I sure couldn't.
Sure you can. You do a fine job trying. I give you extra points
for being being a bit less profane and being literate, but you are your
own star in your own right.
> > I'm not an ###hole. Just ask me.
>
> At least your RRAP persona is. Maybe you're a different person when
> you attend CAP meetings, and yet another person when you show up for
> work. But I doubt it.
No you don't.
> I think your rapid changes in MARS affiliation,
> jumping from the Tennessee Militia to the Air Force's CAP program is
> indicative of someone with problems.
My changes in MARS affiliations were not "rapid", Brain. I was in
NMC MARS in the mid-70's to early 80's, and AFMARS from mid-80's to
1990. I was a member of ARMARS only briefly in 1999 while affiliated
with the TDF/TSG.
And there was hardly any "jumping" from the TSG back to CAP.
There was no CAP program within easy driving distance when I joined
TSG. That changed. My CAP affiliation, with gaps during some of my
USMC career and after Bugaboo passed, goes back to 1969.
Again, you come up wanting for facts.
> You're lucky that you chose health care as a career. The industry is
> so hard up for warm bodies that you'd have to kill someone for them to
> fire you. Or maybe not?
Quite the contrary.
The state of litigation in healthcare predisposes companies to
firing people at will.
Again, Brain comes up short on facts. (As if THAT was new......)
> > > Now all you have to do is apologize.
> >
> > For...?!?!
>
> For repeatedly posting about RRAP Mark's sexuality and religion.
> Neither of those subjects have anything to do with radio.
Two thirds of what flops into this pool have anything to do with
radio.
So...tell me why you think I should be unilaterally subjected to
any restrictions on topics or content, Brain...And make it believable
> > > > > I've never heard of you, and this is the only post that you've ever
> > > > > made to RRAP.
> > > >
> > > > And until YOU changed screen names, no one had heard of
> > > > "hot-ham-and-cheese" either...But then since you refuse to voluntarily
> > > > sign your posts or include your call sign, who knows who YOU are
> > > > without thirds parties "outing" you, Brain...?!?! If it weren't for
> > > > anyone else telling them that "hot-ham-and-cheese" was Brian P. Burke,
> > > > N0IMD, you'd just be another anonymous poster too!
> > >
> > > And Steven J Robeson, K4YZ, Tennessee Nurse should apologize to Mark
> > > for making his sexuality and religion the subject of an amateur radio
> > > discussion group.
> >
> > Then we'd have to demand apologies from you and Lennie for
> > bodacious lies and deceitful behaviour that you've perpetuated, and
> > where would THAT get anyone?
>
> Would "we?"
Yes, "we" would.
Do you know what the law calls a situation where one person is
subjected to restrictions that other persons are not subjected to,
Brain?
> > As for the sex and religion comments, you've GOT to be kidding us,
> > Brainnie.
>
> Fine.
>
> > That started way before Markie came along and will continue way
> > after he get's his just desserts.
>
> Yes, I'm aware of that. Your frequent references to male genitalia,
> bunkmates, in bed with, men maried to men, homosexuality, and
> pedophilia are well documented.
So are yours. And Lennies. And Toiddies. And especially
Markies.
> > > > > Mark is merely giving back to Steve what Steve has given to Mark and
> > > > > the rest of this group. Except for the fact that Mark can out-###hole
> > > > > Steve, and Steve hates it.
> > > >
> > > > Oh no! I do NOT "hate it"...!
> > >
> > > Sure you do. That's why you have to impersonate someone called "Tom
> > > B."
> >
> > And here we have Brian P Burke, N0IMD, promulgating a lie of his
> > very own making!
>
> Prove it.
Can't prove a negative, Brain. But you're welcome to follow the
headers to your hearts content.
> > > > I think Mark's behaviour is as "funny as all get-out"... ! ! !
> > >
> > > I can only imagine you "moving against" Rodney Dangerfield for being so
> > > funny.
> >
> > Was there a point in that? If so, I missed it.
>
> Feigning lawsuits against folks for being funny as all get-out.
Oh?
Who was feigning?
> > > > And in this circumstance I can say without the slightest fear of
> > > > correction or redirection that Markie has exceeded any "###hole" mode
> > > > that ANYone in this forum is capable of manifesting, even his bretheren
> > > > Feeble Fivers.
> > >
> > > You were his mentor.
> >
> > Nope. He got that from Lennie and you...don't be shy! Take
> > credit where credit is due, Brain!
>
> Starting threads to call out people is your trademark.
Oh? I didn't even file the paperwork.
> > > > > Don't like it? All you have to do is apologize to Mark and promise to
> > > > > restrain yourself from making remarks about Mark's or anyone else's
> > > > > sexuality. Those kind of remarks have nothing to do with RRAP.
> > > >
> > > > You're addressing those comments to "Tom".
> > >
> > > There's a difference?
> >
> > Yep. A big one.
>
> Not from here.
That's probably due to you being an idiot, Brain. But then that's
just my not-so-humble opinion.
> > > > > > (Sorry, Mark, but you've been asking for it.)
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, Steve, but you've been asking for it.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry both of you, but that wasn't me.
> > > >
> > > > Dang but you two are paranoid! FOLLOW THE HEADERS, ya blockheads!
> > >
> > > Right. Like I said, all you have to do to make Tom B happy is
> > > apologize to Mark for making his sexuality and religion the subject of
> > > many RRAP threads.
> >
> > But if I "apologize" to Mark for anything, I'd be lying.
>
> No, you wouldn't.
Sure I would.
> There's
> > nothing to apologize to him for.
>
> Yes, there is.
No, there's not.
> > Steve, K4YZ
>
> "Raped an old friend." I can't imagine why you'd post/forge something
> that foul.
It wasn't forged, and it's no less foul than Markie's allegations
and assertions for the last 7 years.
Steve, K4YZ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- stop lying
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- References:
- Steve
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: K4YZ
- Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: K4YZ
- Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Steve
- Prev by Date: More Markie Mularkie
- Next by Date: More Markie Mularkie
- Previous by thread: Re: Further Feeble Five Flounderings
- Next by thread: stop lying
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
