Re: Another License Idea
- From: Frank Gilliland <wïrenut@NOSPAMïcehouse.net>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 09:39:50 -0800
On 31 Dec 2005 05:52:25 -0800, N2EY@xxxxxxx wrote in
<1136037145.431029.138620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>KØHB wrote:
>> <N2EY@xxxxxxx> wrote
>
>> > Basic: 3525-3625 and 3900-4000
>> > Intermediate: 3525-3750 and 3850-4000
>> > Full: entire band
>
>> I missed where you explained why the bands needed to be divided by class.
>
>It's to serve as an upgrade incentive. Not everyone aspires to run high
>power.
So what you're -really- talking about are low-power and a high-power
license classes?
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another License Idea
- From: KØHB
- Re: Another License Idea
- References:
- Re: Another License Idea
- From: KØHB
- Re: Another License Idea
- Prev by Date: Re: some frogeries look like maybe tood's work
- Next by Date: Re: some fogeries defianetely tood's work
- Previous by thread: Re: Another License Idea
- Next by thread: Re: Another License Idea
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|