Re: If CW is dead....
- From: "Jim Hampton" <aa2qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:54:35 GMT
"KØHB" <groupk0hb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oykQe.1427$4P5.638@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> KØHB wrote
>
> >> E=IR. It's not just a good idea; it's the LAW!
>
> "RST Engineering" <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
> > No, according to G. S. Ohm, R=E/I. The other two forms are merely
algebraic
> > manipulations.
>
> Somebody is always trying to twist the law to suit there own agenda!
Damned
> lawyers!
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> Grand Exhalted Liberator of the Electric Smoke
>
>
>
Hello, Hans
If there *is* any difference, for heaven's sake, please, someone prove it.
It is all relative or mind over matter. If you don't mind, it doesn't
matter ;)
73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA
.
- References:
- If CW is dead....
- From: W2DNE
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: Dan/W4NTI
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: RST Engineering
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: Bill Sohl
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: KØHB
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: RST Engineering
- Re: If CW is dead....
- From: KØHB
- If CW is dead....
- Prev by Date: Re: Stonewalling on WT Docket 05-235?
- Next by Date: Re: It would be funny, if it was not so sad...
- Previous by thread: Re: If CW is dead....
- Next by thread: Re: If CW is dead....
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
