Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- From: John Smith <assemblywizard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:26 -0700
Ted:
Change is usually non-conformity, and may seem chaotic to those stuck in a
rut...
John
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:32:14 -0400, Uncle Ted wrote:
> On 14 Aug 2005 16:05:44 GMT, "Alun L. Palmer" <elektros@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>>Now that the code test is on it's way to join the buggy whip, we need a new
>>issue to argue about. There are a lot of threads here devoted to personal
>>attacks on people I have never heard of. It's getting too much like 80m!
>
> Certain high-profile members of the 80 meter crowd migrated here after
> Riley sent a bunch of NALs a few years ago. I have never seen such a
> group of people so obsessed with each other.
>
> For some it's pills. For others, it's alcohol. But for this group,
> chaos seems to be their drug of choice...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- From: Uncle Ted
- Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- References:
- We need an issue to argue about!
- From: Alun L. Palmer
- Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- From: Uncle Ted
- We need an issue to argue about!
- Prev by Date: Re: Stevie put or shut up
- Next by Date: Re: Stevie put or shut up
- Previous by thread: Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- Next by thread: Re: We need an issue to argue about!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
