Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: "an_old_friend" <konstans@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Aug 2005 23:19:28 -0700
John Smith wrote:
> AOF:
>
> Hey! You got proof the FCC is interested in an amateurs equipment? What,
> is it a gay organization now?
>
> John
not at all they are as interested in Feamle hams equipment as well as,
male hams, nothing gay there. a Bit nosey prehaps not gay
>
> On Sun, 07 Aug 2005 20:40:09 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:
>
> >
> > robert casey wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Because you can never be certain that the ham will NOT
> >> > ever build anything. Additionally, all hams have technical
> >> > responsibility for their stations and the RF signals they
> >> > transmit.
> >> >
> >>
> >> If the FCC is to trust us with the legal ability to
> >> pop the covers off our transmitters and make
> >> adjustments and modifications, we need to have passed
> >> tests to show that we have basic knowledge of RF and
> >> such. That we'd know how to run and maintain a clean
> >> operation.
> >>
> >> It's quite rare that the FCC busts a ham for faulty
> >> equipment anymore.
> >
> > you know the last time the FCC busted a ham for faulty equipment
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: John Smith
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- References:
- RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: K4YZ
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: texasredleg
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: Bill Sohl
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: John Smith
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: Bill Sohl
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: Mike Coslo
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: Bill Sohl
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: robert casey
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- From: John Smith
- RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- Prev by Date: Re: We can end it all right here
- Next by Date: Re: Echos from the past, code a hinderence to a ticket
- Previous by thread: Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- Next by thread: Re: RRAP Regulars A No-Show for WT05-235 Comments
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading