Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: "an old friend" <kb9rqz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Aug 2005 00:08:24 -0700
Dave Heil wrote:
> an_old_friend wrote:
> > Dave Heil wrote:
> >
> > break
> >
> >
> >>No, it isn't.
> >>
> >>doesn't matter where I come in the signal
> >>
> >>Yes, it matters.
> >
> >
> > gee you are looking like you need meds yourself
> >
> > indeed Say "A" and then you say not "A" makes one of them a lie of
> > course, which one i don't know
>
> I've not said "A" or "not A".
>
> I've said that the morse distress call is not "ososososososo"
nope you didn't say that
you said
"doesn't matter where I come in the signal"
"Yes, it matters"
so indeed you said "A" and then not "A"
>
> I've said that it matters "where I come in the signal". It is "SOS",
> Mark, not "OSO" or "ososososososo". It isn't run together and it
> doesn't begin with "o".
and now again you are contradicting yourself, maybe you should go to
bed and get some sleep
>
> >
> >>>I guess your pass if you missed the first letters saying well if he
> >>>can't even get it right isn't worth bothering with
> >>
> >>I can't understand your point.
> >
> >
> > can't or won't?
>
> I can't understand it, Mark. There are simply too many errors in
> spelling, grammar and word positioning to make an educated guess.
then you aren't very bright, can't read context, you certainly can't
say what YOU mean, and expect folks to pick it out of the air but you
won't bother doing so yourself
>
> > Indeed from your problems understanding anything I realy can't accept
> > as true the claims of folks like you that You can't undersatnd my
> > posts, but you can undersatnd Morse encoded signals in real time, sent
> > by real people
>
> That'll have to be one of your unsolved mysteries, Mark. I'd have
> trouble with morse if the words were misspelled and jumbled around. Oh,
> I could copy the letters, but they'd still represent gibberish.
well better than Stevie he claims he read all morse
but you should remember people who live glass house should dress in
basement
>
> > I am quite certain one of those claims is lie as well, which of course
> > is another matter
>
> You seem to have great certainty that any number of people are simply
> lying about any number of things. Of course, that doesn't mean that
> you are correct. You're free to believe any crackpot thing you like.
mighty generous of you
>
> Dave K8MN
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: Dave Heil
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- References:
- Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: K4YZ
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: b.b.
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: K4YZ
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: an old friend
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: LenAnderson
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: b.b.
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: an old friend
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: b.b.
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: Dave Heil
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: Dave Heil
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: an_old_friend
- Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- From: Dave Heil
- Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- Prev by Date: Re: Echos from the past, code a hinderence to a ticket
- Next by Date: Re: What Would *You* Change (besides the code test)?
- Previous by thread: Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- Next by thread: Re: Comments to the FCC on WT 05-235
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading