Re: Has "antenna" died?
- From: "Wayne" <mygarbagecan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:38:04 -0700
"Cecil Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tBJdm.211513$Ta5.50763@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Michael Coslo wrote:-
Man has no effect upon the weather? Fine, show me the mechanism by which
the retention of heat in the atmosphere is not affect by the percentage
of greenhouse gases and water vapor. We would not exist without the
effect, so discarding the effect is impossible.
Therefore, get rid of all the water and CO2? It
appears from the following graph that C02 density
is a lagging indicator introducing the next ice age.
25000 years from now, those greenhouse gases will
come in really handy.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c2/Vostok-ice-core-petit.png
--
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com
Besides that.....earth has bigger catastrophic threats than CO2.
.
- References:
- Re: Has "antenna" died?
- From: Art Unwin
- Re: Has "antenna" died?
- From: Michael Coslo
- Re: Has "antenna" died?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Has "antenna" died?
- Prev by Date: RE:Minimum gauge wire for connection to ground rod
- Next by Date: Re: UNUN Cores?How To Wind?
- Previous by thread: Re: Has "antenna" died?
- Next by thread: Re: Has "antenna" died?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|