Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- From: AndyS <andysharpe@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 16:10:03 -0800 (PST)
Peter O. Brackett wrote:
Sort of like rotating a flashlight, or the beam of a searchlight or
coastal
lighthouse.
Andy comments:
Exactly right !!! And a good analogy....
Consider this then:
A patch antenna, circularly polarized, mounted at the end of a
motor shaft, rotating in the opposite direction of the polarization...
..... at a speed equal to the frequency...
Does the polarization "unravel" and emit a linear, non-rotating
polarization ?
Is this the sort of principle that you were trying to convey ??
If this is the case, any discrepancy in the motor, say 1 hz out of
10 Mhz , would result in an Efield rotating at a 1 hz rate.... and
the
receiving antenna would have to be very very very long in order
to fully receive the polarized wave....... I think....
And if the motor shaft and the frequency were identical, the Efield
would be linear, stable, and non-rotating.....
This is getting beyond my personal antenna expertise, but I still find
it
interesting....... Please pardon my lack of understanding, .... if I
still
don't "get" it....
Andy W4OAH
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- From: Peter O. Brackett
- Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- References:
- Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- From: Peter O. Brackett
- Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- From: AndyS
- Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- From: Peter O. Brackett
- Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- Prev by Date: Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- Next by Date: Re: confusion about path loss calculation for zigbee
- Previous by thread: Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- Next by thread: Re: Circular polarization... does it have to be synchronous??
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|