Re: wbc400 vs cnt400
- From: "JB" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 15:35:20 GMT
They are comparable. CommScope, Inc. wbc400
Yours may be a little more flexible. Same size, connector, loss per foot,
material.
like Times lmr400
like Andrew cnt400
Quality? You be the judge, you don't get the cool Andrew logo.
It seems that CommScope bought or merged with Andrew:
http://www.commscope.com/andrew/eng/solutions/wiress_infra/
Make sure it never gets water inside. Use a RG213 pigtail around the rotor.
"ml" <m@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:m-9E7673.10460128092008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
hi
in laymans terms does anyone know the practical differences
between these two cables from same firm?
the loss seems about the same,
some company i bought some cnt400 from sent me wbc which i am
not familiar with trying to see if i got ripped
thanks
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: wbc400 vs cnt400
- From: Jeff Liebermann
- Re: wbc400 vs cnt400
- References:
- wbc400 vs cnt400
- From: ml
- wbc400 vs cnt400
- Prev by Date: wbc400 vs cnt400
- Next by Date: Re: Observations
- Previous by thread: wbc400 vs cnt400
- Next by thread: Re: wbc400 vs cnt400
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading