Re: The Rest of the Story
- From: Keith Dysart <Keith.Dysart@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 02:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Apr 1, 12:06 am, Cecil Moore <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Keith Dysart wrote:
We are talking about the same circuit, which you now
claim exhibits interference, rendering your hypothesis
moot.
If the average interference is zero, the average
reflected power is dissipated in the source resistor.
All of your unethical lies, innuendo, and hand-waving
will not change that fact of physics.
More precisely, the average value of the imputed reflected
power is numerically equal to the increase in the average
power dissipated in the source resistor.
It is not obvious why you reject this more precise, less
misleading description. Is there an intent to mislead the
reader?
...Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Rest of the Story
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: The Rest of the Story
- References:
- Re: The Rest of the Story
- From: Keith Dysart
- Re: The Rest of the Story
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: The Rest of the Story
- Prev by Date: Re: The Rest of the Story
- Next by Date: Re: The Rest of the Story
- Previous by thread: Re: The Rest of the Story
- Next by thread: Re: The Rest of the Story
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
