Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- From: "John KD5YI" <groups1_dot_jocjo@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:31:16 GMT
"user" <dag@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fs91dk$r6d$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Take a look here too:
http://cordis.europa.eu/ictresults/index.cfm/section/news/tpl/article/BrowsingType/Features/ID/89327
“The transmit antennas need to be spatially separated by between 10 and 20
wavelengths and a delay applied to one antenna to achieve effective
de-correlation. The amount of separation and delay depends on the type of
environment to be covered,” says Bard.
Can someone explain this de-correlation to me? Is this not the same as a phase shift? Would there not be a de-correlation when moving from broadside to end fire?
Thanks for any assistance,
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- From: Jim Lux
- Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- References:
- Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- From: user
- Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- From: Wimpie
- Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- From: user
- Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- Prev by Date: Re: Directional antenna in the 215 to 218 MHz band
- Next by Date: FS: Open form coils
- Previous by thread: Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- Next by thread: Re: Double dipole better than YAGI 5 elements??
- Index(es):