Re: Do receiver antennas need matching or not?

Jeff Liebermann wrote:

Ghosts are a big problem where I live. Or multipath and the resulting
dropouts the case of DTV broadcasts. That's why I like highly
directional designs (both horizontally as well as vertically). Other
than that, I can get all of our local stations with rabbit ears and a
UHF loop.


I live too far away from the local digital TV xmitters to get reliable
reception. My rule of thumb is that if OTA analog TV reception is
marginal, digital TV will be worse.

Highly directional antennas are the right way to eliminate ghosts
(reflections). However, I keep running into problems with f/b (front
to back) ratio problems, where the ghosts are reflected from behind
the antenna. That's where the lower gain, but higher f/b ratio
antennas, such as a barbeque grill backed bowtie array, makes more
sense. My preference is to use single channel narrowband yagi's for
maximum gain, but that gets really ugly as one per channel is
required.



Actually, with modern high quality receivers (which may not include the $40 DTV to NTSC converters), they use a rake receiver to coherently combine the multiple paths, so it's very likely that you'd get a better signal with digital (i.e. the receiver would lock and you'd get ANY output) than with analog in a multipathy, but not faint signal environment.

One of the design goals for DTV was to be multipath immune.


Note that in Europe, they actually transmit the identical signal from multiple transmitter sites, guaranteeing multiple arriving signals with different timing. Different modulation scheme, but the same multipath issues. The same has been proposed for use in the US


However, with DTV, signal strength is more of an issue,mostly because there isn't a "degraded mode" like there is with analog. Most viewers are willing to tolerate remarkably degraded signals on an analog channel, so folks are used to being able to receive a TV signal well beyond the nominal service boundary. With digital, either you got it or you don't. Some gain in the antenna helps..
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Do receiver antennas need matching or not?
    ... dropouts the case of DTV broadcasts. ... combine the multiple paths, so it's very likely that you'd get a better ... are willing to tolerate remarkably degraded signals on an analog ... Some gain in the antenna helps.. ...
    (rec.radio.amateur.antenna)
  • Re: This Steampunk thing.....
    ... timing differences between satellite signals measured at multiple ... but decided the multiple antennas would have to be ... but that's easy for electronics to ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • "Theres HDTV In Them Thar Hills"
    ... "My experiences with DTV in the past four years haven't been limited to ... Having more than 30 years' experience with antennas and RF signal ... DTV reception in such diverse locations as Beverly Hills, ... DTV signals can be received over far greater distances than analog TV ...
    (alt.tv.tech.hdtv)
  • Re: sonar matched filter
    ... I have a confusion b/w time domain implementation of matched ... multiple target speeds for time domain MF implemetation as i ... replicas or single zero doppler shifted replica will be enough? ... The only other way I know to process LFM signals is generally called ...
    (comp.dsp)