rec.radio.amateur.antenna

• Date Index

---

• RF Calculator Tool Online - Solve Antenna Equations and Electronic Circuit equations, EngineerEDGE
  • Re: RF Calculator Tool Online - Solve Antenna Equations and Electronic Circuit equations, Alan Peake
• odd readings from watt meters, James Barrett
  • Re: odd readings from watt meters, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: odd readings from watt meters, Dave
    • Re: odd readings from watt meters, Ed Cregger
  • Re: odd readings from watt meters, ltdoc
• SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Ed_G
  • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, John Ferrell
    • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Ed_G
    • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Owen Duffy
  • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Cecil Moore
    • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Ed_G
      • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, ltdoc
      • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Ed_G
      • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Cecil Moore
  • Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question, Bruce in alaska
• Antenna suggestions for Vertex FTL-2011 mounted on Metal and fiberglass railroad equipment., DVoeltz
  • Re: Antenna suggestions for Vertex FTL-2011 mounted on Metal and fiberglass railroad equipment., pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Antenna suggestions for Vertex FTL-2011 mounted on Metal and fiberglass railroad equipment., Mike Coslo
• ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Sonny Hood
  • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Cecil Moore
    • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Sonny Hood
  • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Jim Lux
  • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Sonny Hood
      • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Cecil Moore
      • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: ? 75M Inverted Vee GAIN, Owen Duffy
• Wire Antenna/ Tree interaction, marc
  • Re: Wire Antenna/ Tree interaction, Jim Lux
    • Re: Wire Antenna/ Tree interaction, AK
• 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cheers
  • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Highland Ham
    • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cheers
      • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cheers
      • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, K7ITM
  • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cecil Moore
    • Re: 2 x 4 to 1 voltage balun in series, Cheers
• noise canceling Elevator /HF?, ml
  • Re: noise canceling Elevator /HF?, Richard Clark
    • Re: noise canceling Elevator /HF?, ml
      • Re: noise canceling Elevator /HF?, Richard Clark
      • Re: noise canceling Elevator /HF?, ml
• Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
  • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Dave Platt
    • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Dave Platt
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
  • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, stephen . roberts . m0sjr
    • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, stephen . roberts . m0sjr
      • Re: Cobwebb antenna question?, Barrett
• s il vous plait;;;ici F5MNC, berny
  • Re: s il vous plait;;;ici F5MNC, dfinn1
  • Re: s il vous plait;;;ici F5MNC, Hal Rosser
• Re: Online RF & Microwave Engineering Calculator Tool FREE to use, amdx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Online RF & Microwave Engineering Calculator Tool FREE to use, Mr Fed UP
• Re: Oddball Antenna Question?, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Oddball Antenna Question?, Richard Fry
    • Re: Oddball Antenna Question?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Oddball Antenna Question?, Richard Fry
      • Re: Oddball Antenna Question?, Roy Lewallen
• LORAN - C, George
  • Re: LORAN - C, Richard Clark
    • Re: LORAN - C, Bruce in alaska
    • Re: LORAN - C, Wim Ton
      • Re: LORAN - C, Richard Clark
  • Re: LORAN - C, Roger D Johnson
    • Re: LORAN - C, George
    • Re: LORAN - C, Howard W3CQH
• LPY antenna designs?, K7ITM
  • Re: LPY antenna designs?, Dave
    • Re: LPY antenna designs?, K7ITM
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, Dave
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, K7ITM
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, no
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, K7ITM
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, no
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, no
      • Re: LPY antenna designs?, K7ITM
• Grounding in Sand, Ed_G
  • Re: Grounding in Sand, Dave
    • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ed_G
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ed_G
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Richard Clark
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ed_G
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Richard Clark
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ed_G
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, John Ferrell
  • Re: Grounding in Sand, Bruce in alaska
    • Re: Grounding in Sand, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Harold E. Johnson
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Grounding in Sand, Harold E. Johnson
• Shortened radials: which length?, Francesco L.
  • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Highland Ham
  • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Richard Clark
    • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Francesco L.
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Wimpie
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Buck
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Francesco L.
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, John Passaneau
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Francesco L.
  • Re: Shortened radials: which length?, Richard Harrison
• feedpoint impedance, PJ
  • Re: feedpoint impedance, K7ITM
  • Re: feedpoint impedance, AI4QJ
• Three new Ham Radio sites in March!, coley
• Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
  • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
    • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
  • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, J. Mc Laughlin
    • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Dave
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Dave
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Richard Clark
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Sierpinski monopole/dipole carpet antenna (SC) for HF, AI4QJ
• Cheap Muscle Wire to turn antenna, Larry Snyder
  • Re: Cheap Muscle Wire to turn antenna, ltdoc
    • Re: Cheap Muscle Wire to turn antenna, Ed Cregger
• 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, PJ
  • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Eric
    • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, nm5k
      • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, nm5k
  • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Manjimike
    • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Ed_G
      • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Manjimike
      • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, Ed_G
    • Re: 80-10 Helical tapped mobile whip, PJ
• Looking for an old project based on two half wave vertical dipoles by W7DE..., Francesco L.
  • Re: Looking for an old project based on two half wave vertical dipo..., Richard Harrison
    • Re: Looking for an old project based on two half wave vertical dipo..., Cecil Moore
  • Re: Looking for an old project based on two half wave vertical dipoles by W7DE..., Eskay
    • Re: Looking for an old project based on two half wave vertical dipoles by W7DE..., Francesco L.
• Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Rick
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Tom Donaly
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Michael Coslo
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, dfinn1
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Brian Kelly
      • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Michael Coslo
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, amdx
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Hal Rosser
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Lumpy
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Michael Black
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Rick
      • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Brian Kelly
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, Richard Clark
  • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, John Smith
    • Re: Off Topic means it doesn't belong here, John Smith
• W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
  • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, K7ITM
    • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
    • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
    • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Keith Dysart
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Keith Dysart
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Keith Dysart
      • Message not available
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, K7ITM
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, K7ITM
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Richard Clark
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, K7ITM
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: W7EL's Food for Thought: Forward and Reverse Power, Cecil Moore
• Attn Cel Phone Users, Howard W3CQH
  • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Bert Hyman
    • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Highland Ham
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Bert Hyman
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Wayne
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, D. Stussy
      • Message not available
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, D. Stussy
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Wayne
      • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, D. Stussy
  • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, Michael Coslo
  • Re: Attn Cel Phone Users, John Smith
• The South Pole Telescope, common sense
  • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
    • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Tom Donaly
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Michael Coslo
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Rick
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, common sense
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, AI4QJ
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Cecil Moore
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, dfinn1
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Harrison
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Cecil Moore
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Michael Coslo
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, jawod
    • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Tom Ring
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Richard Clark
  • Re: The South Pole Telescope, gwatts
    • Re: The South Pole Telescope, greenhornet
  • Re: The South Pole Telescope, John Passaneau
    • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Cecil Moore
      • Re: The South Pole Telescope, David G. Nagel
  • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Ed Cregger
    • Re: The South Pole Telescope, dfinn1
  • Re: The South Pole Telescope, Tehrasha Darkon
• ttenuation As A Function Of Material, Freq., etc. ?, Robert11
  • Re: ttenuation As A Function Of Material, Freq., etc. ?, Richard Clark
  • Re: ttenuation As A Function Of Material, Freq., etc. ?, K7ITM
  • Re: ttenuation As A Function Of Material, Freq., etc. ?, David G. Nagel
• Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
  • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jay in the Mojave
    • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Bob Miller
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Richard Clark
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Jimmie D
      • Re: Flagpole J for 10 Meters, Richard Clark
• www.sneakersea.com wholesale NFL NHL NBA jerseys nike sneaker jordan new mix shoes gucci prada dunk puma air force one shoes, chenjunjun8
• 100 Pages of New Videos Added, WillWeav
  • Re: 100 Pages of New Videos Added, Tehrasha Darkon
• Re: Group Velocity and Velocity Factor, Richard Harrison
• far radials for verticle?, ml
  • Re: far radials for verticle?, ltdoc
    • Re: far radials for verticle?, ml
  • Re: far radials for verticle?, Richard Clark
    • Noise// far radials for verticle?, ml
      • Re: Noise// far radials for verticle?, Richard Clark
• tv ant look alike? LP, ml
  • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Richard Clark
    • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, ml
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Richard Clark
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, J. Mc Laughlin
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Buck
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, ml
  • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Cecil Moore
  • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, David G. Nagel
    • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, ml
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Cecil Moore
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Dave Platt
      • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, ml
  • Re: tv ant look alike? LP, Silfax
• Vertical Antenna Performance Question, N0GW
  • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
    • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, N0GW
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
  • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, N0GW
  • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
    • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, dfinn1
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, nm5k
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Jerry
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Buck
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Jerry
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Dave Heil
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Mike Coslo
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Tom Ring
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, common sense
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Tom Ring
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, jimp
  • Re: Vertical Antenna Performance Question, Hal Rosser
• 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, art
  • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Tom Donaly
    • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, art
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Denny
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, art
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, art
  • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Richard Harrison
    • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Tom Ring
    • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, art
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, AI4QJ
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, nm5k
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Richard Clark
      • Re: 'SMALL' ANTENNA CRITERIA, Richard Harrison
• Standing wave and power, Yuri Blanarovich
  • Re: Standing wave and power, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: Standing wave and power, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Standing wave and power, JIMMIE
      • Re: Standing wave and power, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Standing wave and power, Roy Lewallen
• High ohm connections, MGFoster
  • Re: High ohm connections, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: High ohm connections, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: High ohm connections, Hal Rosser
    • Re: High ohm connections, Richard Clark
      • Re: High ohm connections, Bryan
  • Re: High ohm connections, MGFoster
    • Re: High ohm connections, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: High ohm connections, Owen Duffy
  • Re: High ohm connections, Rick Frazier
    • Re: High ohm connections, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: High ohm connections, Hal Rosser
• Re: FS: GPIB (HPIB) IEEE 488.2 PCI-controller NATIONAL INSTRUMENTS NI. $199 COST FAR BELOW ORIGINAL, Cecil Moore
• Re: RF Power Resistors from Caddock, Buck
  • Re: RF Power Resistors from Caddock, Richard Clark
    • Re: RF Power Resistors from Caddock, Bryan
• practical yagi question, francesco . messineo
  • Re: practical yagi question, Hal Rosser
    • Re: practical yagi question, francesco . messineo
      • Re: practical yagi question, Harry7
      • Re: practical yagi question, ltdoc
      • Re: practical yagi question, Jimmie D
      • Re: practical yagi question, francesco . messineo
• Why do Muslims think that Islam is true. Is there any factual basis?, small giant
  • Re: Why do Muslims think that Islam is true. Is there any factual basis?, ltdoc
    • Re: Why do Muslims think that Islam is true. Is there any factual basis?, Cecil Moore
• C42 Radio Set Manual, Peter
• EZNEC output Touchstone file?, Al Lorona
  • Re: EZNEC output Touchstone file?, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: EZNEC output Touchstone file?, Al Lorona
• Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
  • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Rick Frazier
    • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, The Shadow
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Richard Clark
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, R.Scott
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, MGFoster
  • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Yuri Blanarovich
    • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Bob Miller
    • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, AI4QJ
    • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Swoozie Pellegrino
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question, Richard Clark
• Re: Governor Romney dismissed role of Amateur Radio Operators in Emergencies., Sum Ting Wong
• k0tar - Tom Ring, KF4DNA
  • Re: k0tar - Tom Ring, Tom Ring
    • Re: k0tar - Tom Ring, KF4DNA
• Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Marcus Tait
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, ltdoc
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Helmut Wabnig
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Richard Clark
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Wimpie
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Bruce in alaska
    • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Jim Lux
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Owen Duffy
    • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Tam
  • Re: Tuning antenna using signal gen and spectrum analyser, Roy Lewallen
• Reg: get free loans, randdy . syrus
  • Re: Reg: get free loans, ltdoc
• Aluminum foil capacitance hat, MGFoster
  • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, MGFoster
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Richard Clark
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Jim Lux
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, MGFoster
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Michael Coslo
    • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, MGFoster
      • Re: Aluminum foil capacitance hat, Michael Coslo
• Zo of two wire open line, Owen Duffy
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, John KD5YI
    • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Owen Duffy
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Richard Clark
    • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Owen Duffy
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Owen Duffy
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Wimpie
  • Re: Zo of two wire open line, Alan Peake
• Horizontal loop antenna, Bruce W . Ellis
  • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Clark
    • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, LA4RT Jon Kåre Hellan
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Jon K Hellan
  • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Denny
  • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, pcsutton
    • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Sum Ting Wong
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Harold E. Johnson
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Sum Ting Wong
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Sum Ting Wong
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Dave Platt
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Sum Ting Wong
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Dave Platt
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
  • Horizontal loop antenna - Dual Wire, Buck
    • Re: Horizontal loop antenna - Dual Wire, Richard Clark
      • Re: Horizontal loop antenna - Dual Wire, Buck
• Re: WebPage, Tom Ring
  • Re: WebPage, AI4QJ
• Re: Extreme WebPage, Tom Ring
  • Re: Extreme WebPage, AI4QJ
    • Re: Extreme WebPage, Tom Ring
      • Re: Extreme WebPage, KF4DNA
      • Re: Extreme WebPage, funkbastler
• Transmissions on Helical Antenna, MGFoster
  • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, MGFoster
      • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, MGFoster
      • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Transmissions on Helical Antenna, Richard Clark
• 7/8th diameter Heliax, Jerry
  • Re: 7/8th diameter Heliax, Ed Cregger
    • Re: 7/8th diameter Heliax, Richard Clark
• Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Dave99
  • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, K7ITM
    • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Ed Cregger
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Dave99
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Jerry
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, K7ITM
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Dave99
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, John KD5YI
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, K7ITM
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, K7ITM
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Dave99
      • Re: Determining velocity factor for metal tube?, Jerry
• Easy work in hour house, shareha
• Arrl antenna book cd does not install, help, Francesco L.
  • Re: Arrl antenna book cd does not install, help, Richard Clark
  • Re: Arrl antenna book cd does not install, help, ml
    • Re: Arrl antenna book cd does not install, help, Roger
• SpiderBeam, jawod
  • Re: SpiderBeam, Brian Kelly
    • Re: SpiderBeam, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: SpiderBeam, john Wiener
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Brian Kelly
    • Re: SpiderBeam, john Wiener
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Brian Kelly
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Tom Horne
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Brian Kelly
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Tom Horne
      • Message not available
      • Re: SpiderBeam, tclay
      • Re: SpiderBeam, tclay
      • Re: SpiderBeam, Jim Lux
• How does it feel to use a commercial high gain curtain antenna and being a HF big gun for a weekend.., pa3abk
  • Re: How does it feel to use a commercial high gain curtain antenna and being a HF big gun for a weekend.., Suzy
  • Re: How does it feel to use a commercial high gain curtain antenna and being a HF big gun for a weekend.., The Shadow
    • Re: How does it feel to use a commercial high gain curtain antenna and being a HF big gun for a weekend.., Jimmie D
• DAB antenna, dido22
  • Re: DAB antenna, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: DAB antenna, Jimmie D
      • Re: DAB antenna, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: DAB antenna, Roy Lewallen
• Diodes for UHF, Suzy
  • Re: Diodes for UHF, Dave Platt
    • Re: Diodes for UHF, K7ITM
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, Jim Lux
    • Re: Diodes for UHF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, Dave Platt
  • Re: Diodes for UHF, Wimpie
    • Re: Diodes for UHF, AI4QJ
  • Re: Diodes for UHF, Bryan
    • Re: Diodes for UHF, AI4QJ
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, Jim Lux
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, K7ITM
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Diodes for UHF, Jim Lux
  • Re: Diodes for UHF, AI4QJ
• Bird, Suzy
  • Re: Bird, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Bird, John Smith
    • Re: Bird, John Smith
      • Re: Bird, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Bird, Suzy
      • Re: Bird, John Smith
      • Re: Bird, AI4QJ
      • Re: Bird, Suzy
      • Re: Bird, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Bird, John Smith
• Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Francesco L.
  • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, K7ITM
  • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Francesco L.
      • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Francesco L.
      • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Francesco L.
    • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Smash
    • Re: Wilkinson power splitter always necessary?, Jim Lux
• Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
  • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Roger Sparks
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Suzy
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Roger Sparks
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, John KD5YI
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, John KD5YI
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Roger Sparks
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR, Roger Sparks
• 75M loop on 160, Ed_G
• Sort of OT but interesting ..., John Smith
  • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Cecil Moore
    • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., John Smith
      • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Bob Dixon
    • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., John Smith
      • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Dave Platt
      • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., MTV
      • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Karl Beckman
    • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Suzy
    • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Jimmie D
  • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., Eric Oyen - N7ZZT
    • Re: Sort of OT but interesting ..., John Smith
• News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Richard Clark
  • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, AI4QJ
  • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Mike Coslo
    • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Richard Clark
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, AI4QJ
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Richard Clark
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, AI4QJ
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Mike Coslo
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Suzy
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Cecil Moore
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Cecil Moore
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Cecil Moore
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Message not available
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Message not available
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Suzy
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, dfinn1
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Michael Coslo
      • Re: News group protocol - or the Lie Direct, Mike Coslo
• Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Waves vs Particles, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Waves vs Particles, Ed Cregger
    • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John KD5YI
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, jimp
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, K7ITM
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Suzy
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John KD5YI
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John KD5YI
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John KD5YI
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Ring
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Ring
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, K7ITM
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, K7ITM
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Ed Cregger
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Passaneau
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, cliff wright
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, cliff wright
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, cliff wright
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Siyazini
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, David G. Nagel
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, cliff wright
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Peter
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, art
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Suzy
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, John Smith
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Peter
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Peter
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Peter
  • Re: Waves vs Particles, Wimpie
    • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Wimpie
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, dfinn1
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, AI4QJ
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Richard Clark
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Ring
      • Re: Waves vs Particles, Tom Ring
• Re: Window line billowing in the wind, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, Ed_G
      • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, Tim Shoppa
    • Re: Window line billowing in the wind, Bryan
• Re: G5RV antenna feed line balance., Peter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: G5RV antenna feed line balance., pa1are
    • Re: G5RV antenna feed line balance., cliff wright
  • Re: G5RV antenna feed line balance., Owen Duffy
• Re: Magnetic Longwire Balun Question !!, Lee
  • Re: Magnetic Longwire Balun Question !!, Richard Clark
• Re: DE W3TDH I need a portable HF antenna set up., Tom Horne
  • Re: DE W3TDH I need a portable HF antenna set up., Mike Coslo
    • Re: DE W3TDH I need a portable HF antenna set up., Tom Horne
      • Re: DE W3TDH I need a portable HF antenna set up., Michael Coslo
• Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Cecil Moore
    • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Tom Donaly
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Cecil Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Gene Fuller
    • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Cecil Moore
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Gene Fuller
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Cecil Moore
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest m..., Richard Harrison
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest m..., Gene Fuller
      • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest m..., Cecil Moore
  • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Tom Donaly
  • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Tom Donaly
    • Re: Energy Cancellation (or conversion of radiation to dark rest mass?), Cecil Moore
• Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Jim Lux
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Owen Duffy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Jim Lux
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Owen Duffy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Jim Lux
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Jim Lux
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, K7ITM
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, K7ITM
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Owen Duffy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Owen Duffy
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ian White GM3SEK
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, K7ITM
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, K7ITM
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Suzy
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Jeff
  • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ralph Mowery
    • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Richard Clark
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Richard Clark
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, K7ITM
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Tom Ring
      • Re: 70cm reflectometer?, Tom Ring
• Re: Wave Cancellation, Cecil Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wave Cancellation, Gene Fuller
    • Re: Wave Cancellation, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Wave Cancellation, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Wave Cancellation, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Wave Cancellation, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Wave Cancellation, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Wave Cancellation, AI4QJ
    • Re: Wave Cancellation, Richard Clark
      • Re: Wave Cancellation, AI4QJ
  • Re: Wave Cancellation, Richard Harrison

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(10)