Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: ltdoc@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Antenna tuners 'like' antennas that are 'too long' better than
antennas that are 'too short'. That doesn't say anything about how
well that 'too long'/'too short' antenna will perform, just that the
average tuner will find it easier to deal with one that's 'too long'.
(Easier to 'cram' more capacitance into a tuner than inductance.) If
this antenna is a doublet, 'balanced', why would you need a
'groundplane'? And while I'd guess that it'll never be 'ideal', the
building is acting as a 'groundplane' anyway, sort of.
- 'Doc
(What am I not understanding about the situation?)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: Ed_G
- Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- References:
- SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: Ed_G
- Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: Ed_G
- Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- From: Cecil Moore
- SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- Prev by Date: Re: odd readings from watt meters
- Next by Date: Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- Previous by thread: Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- Next by thread: Re: SGC coupler to Dipole feedling question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|