Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: "AI4QJ" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 21:52:24 -0500
"cliff wright" <c.c.wright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:47b0fd92@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cecil Moore wrote:
cliff wright wrote:
The null results of SETI do not surprise me for a similar reason. If
there are advanced starfaring races out there radio or other EM
communication would be woefully inadequate and either not used at all or
only for very specialised (and slow) directional links which are
unlikely to send data towards Earth.
If I was a member of an advanced race, I would be using
entangled particles for FTL communications. However, I
would also be listening for those primitive slow obsolete
EM waves.
Well Cecil, you might be listening, but I might not be sending!
It often amuses me to consider just how naive humans can be in advertising
their presence in our spiral arm for a long time now.
I think this is the "real" reason that the FCC tells us to use only the
minimum power necessary to maintain communications ;-)
.
- References:
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: AI4QJ
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: AI4QJ
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: K7ITM
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: K7ITM
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Tom Donaly
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Richard Clark
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: cliff wright
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- Prev by Date: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Next by Date: Re: Another Stealth Antenna Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Next by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|