Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: "AI4QJ" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:33:21 -0500
"Roy Lewallen" <w7el@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:13q89hvg3g8af2a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
AI4QJ wrote:
"Cecil Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jmQoj.1450$R84.898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Cecil Moore <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Maybe "an incredibly complex substance"
Quoting "Alpha and Omega", by Seife,Are you saying space is a fluid?
"Empty space is an incredibly complex substance, ...
exhibits some characteristics of a fluid?
I should say "characteristic" impedance is 377 Ohms. It also has a
permitivity and permeability of 1 ;-)
I'm sure you mean relative permittivity and relative permeability.
No, this is not correct. The permitivities and permeabilities of all
materials are relative to free space. Free space is assumed to be 1 and the
other values are relative to it.
The characteristic impedance is the square root of permeability divided
by permittivity, so if both are one, the characteristic impedance would
have to be one.
No, this is not correct.
begin 666 4120fac3841a15908b0bd8c32d1488e4.png
MB5!.1PT*&@H````-24A$4@```.@````3" ,```"M(K&0````,U!,5$7____H
MZ.@@(" L+"Q:6EK1T=%^?GX+"PNFIJ:2DI(```!*2DHZ.CJ[N[L$! 04%!1L
M;&QLM2N9```#DTE$0518"=U6VX*M( A%4[>9MOO_KSW<%&MJ]IS'&1^*8+D`
M10S@CX_6+$'G_1)P+#Z:\E%R.;,M3@P`JB3+;.A@5.>.GW30'<XZ:*HU3E$8
ML4D<RN,CUIK6NG3/Z<6AKV5[G&&&X\CIO>)W*#(.E-=ES:$'/1D&&))?5W%H
M.FC5"_&D`W :SN#L,",VR0*[D?*+4VRO),8JGWN]P5Y5F18C[0Z@4A&$\*;O
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M8&0P= T/`*W*B7/ D**WO$GJ3J]O<4?:T3]"T6-[PDJWT>>PM)QZOW;2O@IU
M&NBMC8!JH*08?$ET$(P,!BFM(2<Z<PZ8$4\2.;P=K6C;:$67)_$1<@[<D;%T
M/HZF7>R0Y2F<+_=?G:H&_B+P*5'4=@++0'7LG1.=.0UFQ"8]A^OU'NFW6)9(
MDP./N8X3_$P`;V%XTSW0"\,*!4 -PH#@GNAH@TI@&2 4=52XLJ-2;,II,",V
M2;S</3,U31QZ+MN.UR".`(V2]!(]*:8A#1TO<Q;D<$<^<KVU3(FJ80(7/M9X
M;4XZ\L"K:KI,'FNI(4J[NB;:/>*=K+Z1Y)L1.-I5>@I>H)QW/L1O[XBW\Z/<
M$[(AJSJ3ZV63Y:)I:IC ,@'OT4F'0$GTK--;FI= .<>.=H_#Q6V078EMF2MO
M<Q"P5-_TOR)'A F_3106`D<YW'T/'34.MV,E1+F9N\' Z873''DR'6HT@Y-.
M$C5.@R%^[*-)ZG,X[T$`;#ESHC7C)D(M_$/O"_X8_2!15Y/+7IK0<)9\C OI
M+HE.X&V)S=,)G'0AO/:-[HM)AT$L&!'^E'1./$$*^]]$#_P91X^ +SUY]$4C
M\1F]NVG$SL]V8-?BX;1[8X(IC?L-368P<!S33"<T]+S173@9:\0F&<G/)4<%
M]II#_OG<WX5,!Z0/&_J[$GJ,-N:_NI__`%_G'GED)3Z%`````$E%3D2N0F""
`
end
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: John KD5YI
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- References:
- Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: AI4QJ
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Waves vs Particles
- Prev by Date: Re: Sort of OT but interesting ...
- Next by Date: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Previous by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Next by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
