Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Roy Lewallen <w7el@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:13:50 -0800
AI4QJ wrote:
"Cecil Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:jmQoj.1450$R84.898@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxpdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:Cecil Moore <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Maybe "an incredibly complex substance"Quoting "Alpha and Omega", by Seife,Are you saying space is a fluid?
"Empty space is an incredibly complex substance, ...
exhibits some characteristics of a fluid?
I should say "characteristic" impedance is 377 Ohms. It also has a permitivity and permeability of 1 ;-)
I'm sure you mean relative permittivity and relative permeability.
The characteristic impedance is the square root of permeability divided by permittivity, so if both are one, the characteristic impedance would have to be one.
Roy Lewallen, W7EL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: AI4QJ
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- References:
- Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Waves vs Particles
- From: AI4QJ
- Waves vs Particles
- Prev by Date: Re: 70cm reflectometer?
- Next by Date: Re: 70cm reflectometer?
- Previous by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Next by thread: Re: Waves vs Particles
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading