Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:19:47 GMT
Keith Dysart wrote:
Also consider that field lines never cross. It would
therefore seem impossible for the two electric fields
associated with two EM waves to pass each other
without interaction.
They certainly superpose so the field lines don't
cross but superposition doesn't cause interaction
in free space or in a constant-Z0 transmission line
where neither medium changes. Free space superposition
results in zero reflections.
And whether the wave in space is viewed as passing
or bouncing, the results should be the same, just
as it is on a transmission line.
Any "view" is possible in your mind but not every
view of yours that is possible is associated with
reality. Your view could just as easily be the
same as my mother's (RIP), i.e. that God is
responsible for everything.
If your view is disassociated from reality, it is
no better than a religion.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
.
- References:
- Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roy Lewallen
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Roger
- Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- From: Keith Dysart
- Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- Prev by Date: Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- Next by Date: Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- Previous by thread: Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- Next by thread: Re: Standing-Wave Current vs Traveling-Wave Current
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|