rec.radio.amateur.antenna

• Date Index

---

• Re: opinions on an antenna idea, Richard Clark
  • Re: opinions on an antenna idea, James barrett
• Matching assembly R3 antenna ?, albedo
  • Re: Matching assembly R3 antenna ?, gb
• FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, jrsinglesli@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Denny
  • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Michael Coslo
    • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Christopher Cox
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Michael Coslo
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Cecil Moore
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Christopher Cox
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Cecil Moore
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Michael Coslo
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Michael Coslo
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Michael Coslo
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Cecil Moore
      • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Tom Donaly
  • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, John Smith
    • Re: FOR SALE - HOME BREW BALANCED LINE ANTENNA TUNER - TWIN ROLLER INDUCTORS, Brian Kelly
• Does anyone have a good tutorial on COFDM?, MRW
  • Re: Does anyone have a good tutorial on COFDM?, Wimpie
• DLM Comparisons, Richard Fry
  • Re: DLM Comparisons, John Smith
    • Re: DLM Comparisons, Richard Fry
      • Re: DLM Comparisons, John Smith
      • Re: DLM Comparisons, Richard Clark
      • Re: DLM Comparisons, John Smith
• 18AVQ details required, JERD
  • Re: 18AVQ details required, Jon Teske
  • Re: 18AVQ details required, gb
  • Re: 18AVQ details required, Sum Ting Wong
• Re: check out this site!, Bert Hyman
• Tarheel vs High Sierra (Sidekick) antennas, Newman
• Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, mcclements
  • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, Richard Clark
    • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, mcclements
      • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, Richard Clark
  • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, Highland Ham
    • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, mcclements
  • Re: Does an UnUn decouple an antenna from the feedline?, Cecil Moore
• using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
  • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Richard Clark
  • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
    • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Michael Coslo
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Highland Ham
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Richard Clark
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Richard Clark
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Ian Jackson
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James Barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Jeff
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
  • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Jimmie D
  • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Jeff
    • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
  • Message not available
    • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Richard Clark
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Edwin Johnson
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Michael Coslo
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, James barrett
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Richard Clark
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: using an MFJ-941E tuner on all bands?, Roy Lewallen
• Vincent antenna, art
  • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
    • Re: Vincent antenna, art
    • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, AI4QJ
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Jimmie D
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Vincent antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jimmie D
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Fry
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • tesla coils antennas maxwellRe: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: tesla coils antennas maxwellRe: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, AI4QJ
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, AI4QJ
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, AI4QJ
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, AI4QJ
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, John Smith
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, K7ITM
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, K7ITM
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, K7ITM
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, art
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, K7ITM
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, K7ITM
      • Re: Loading Coils; was : Vincent antenna, Cecil Moore
• What is the proper yagi class for my antenna?, Richard
• A Bailey book on TV antennas, art
  • Re: A Bailey book on TV antennas, John Smith
    • Re: A Bailey book on TV antennas, art
      • Re: A Bailey book on TV antennas, John Smith
      • Re: A Bailey book on TV antennas, art
• CL-33-M-WARC Kit, dave . knight
• OpenPF document format ?, 4nec2
  • Re: OpenPF document format ?, Gary Gapinski
    • Re: OpenPF document format ?, 4nec2
• Wireless packet data transmission, MRW
  • Re: Wireless packet data transmission, Dave
  • Re: Wireless packet data transmission, Dave Platt
    • Re: Wireless packet data transmission, MRW
  • Re: Wireless packet data transmission, John Smith
• Games, craZ4legos@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Games, Bryan
    • Re: Games, The Shadow
• Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Robert Smts
  • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Richard Clark
    • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Robert Smts
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Richard Clark
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Robert Smts
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Highland Ham
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Robert Smts
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Edwin Johnson
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Delta Loop Feed Orientation and Angle of Radiation, Robert Smts
• Experience with multiband Loops?, Robert Smts
• Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, John Smith
  • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, John Smith
    • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, art
    • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, Dave Heil
      • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, John Smith
      • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, Dave Heil
      • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, Rick
      • Re: Dallas goes online--BIGTIME!, John Smith
• Need electrical help, art
  • Re: Need electrical help, ltdoc
• Home remodeling services los angeles, Toolmannet
  • Re: Home remodeling services los angeles, aRKay
• Antenna rotator, JERD
  • Re: Antenna rotator, Sal M. Onella
    • Re: Antenna rotator, Jeff
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Jeff
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Sal M. Onella
    • Re: Antenna rotator, Brian Kelly
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Antenna rotator, JERD
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Jimmie D
  • Re: Antenna rotator, Bob Bob
  • Re: Antenna rotator, Owen Duffy
  • Re: Antenna rotator, Bob Miller
    • Re: Antenna rotator, Dave Heil
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Bob Miller
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Highland Ham
      • Re: Antenna rotator, JERD
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Highland Ham
      • Re: Antenna rotator, JERD
      • Re: Antenna rotator, Jim Lux
• Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, John Smith
    • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, John Smith
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Ed Cregger
    • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, John Smith
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Denny
      • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, Martin Krawczyk
  • Re: Long Distance Microwave Oven?, ker2x
• Cell phones packed together, Goan
  • Re: Cell phones packed together, AI4QJ
• IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Nick
  • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Jeff
  • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Bob Miller
  • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Alt Beer
  • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Highland Ham
    • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Jeff
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, art
      • Message not available
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Highland Ham
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Jeff
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Nick
      • Re: IN UK - does anyone sell old style solder anymore ?, Jeff
• Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
  • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, art
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Ian Jackson
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Brian Howie
    • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Richard Clark
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, John Smith
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, art
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, art
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, John Smith
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, John Smith
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, John Smith
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, John Smith
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Richard Clark
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, art
      • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Richard Harrison
    • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
  • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Wimpie
    • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Dave
  • Re: Resontate frequency of parallel L/C, Brian Howie
• Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
  • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
    • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
  • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, K7ITM
    • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Highland Ham
  • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
    • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
    • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Denny
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, mario
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, art
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Tony Giacometti
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, Richard Clark
      • Re: Low Noise receiving Loop antenna, nm5k
• A novice type question, art
  • Re: A novice type question, Hal Rosser
    • Re: A novice type question, art
      • Re: A novice type question, Hal Rosser
      • Re: A novice type question, art
  • Re: A novice type question, John Smith
    • Re: A novice type question, art
• Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Superposition, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Fry
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Fry
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, K7ITM
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Superposition, Tam/WB2TT
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Message not available
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Highland Ham
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Michael Coslo
      • Re: Superposition, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, J. Mc Laughlin
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Superposition, Dave
    • Re: Superposition, Dave
    • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Superposition, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Tom Donaly
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Dave Platt
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Dave
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Gene Fuller
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Superposition, Walter Maxwell
      • Re: Superposition, John Smith
      • Re: Superposition, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, art
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, art
      • Re: Superposition, Keith Dysart
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition (Antenna Arrays), Richard Fry
      • Re: Superposition (Antenna Arrays), Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition (Antenna Arrays), Richard Fry
      • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Superposition, Richard Clark
    • Re: Superposition, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Superposition, AI4QJ
• 4nec2 discussion forum., 4nec2
  • Re: 4nec2 discussion forum., art
• Best wire for long wire antenna, JERD
  • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Bryan
    • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Dave Heil
    • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Tim Shoppa
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, aRKay
  • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Bob Miller
    • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Owen Duffy
    • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Jim Lux
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, ltdoc
  • Re: Best wire for long wire antenna, X-rated Vermonter
• Re:Hygain AV-18S, VK2KCE
• Cuts to the chase ..., John Smith
• 23cm Antenna, marcelvdl
  • Re: 23cm Antenna, JIMMIE
  • Re: 23cm Antenna, Wimpie
  • Re: 23cm Antenna, Brian Howie
    • Re: 23cm Antenna, marcelvdl
• RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Clark
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Tom Donaly
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Tom Donaly
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Tom Donaly
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Harrison
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Jim Kelley
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Jim Kelley
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Harrison
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Harrison
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Richard Harrison
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Cecil Moore
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, John Smith
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, art
    • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Michael Black
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Jim Lux
    • Re: RSGB RadCom December 2007 Issue, Mike Kaliski
• skin depth decay, art
  • Re: skin depth decay, Christopher Cox
    • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, John Passaneau
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Christopher Cox
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay (The sputtering branch of the thread), Christopher Cox
      • Re: skin depth decay (The sputtering branch of the thread), Christopher Cox
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Dave
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Jimmie D
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Thanksgiving, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Thanksgiving, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Thanksgiving, Jim Kelley
      • Re: Thanksgiving, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Dave Platt
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Dave Platt
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay (TDR), Richard Fry
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Jimmie D
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, Cecil Moore
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Clark
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Richard Harrison
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
      • Re: skin depth decay, Mike Lucas
      • Re: skin depth decay, art
• Plasma Antennas, Fred
  • Re: Plasma Antennas, ltdoc
    • Re: Plasma Antennas, Tehrasha Darkon
  • Re: Plasma Antennas, Jedi . Master . Laybourn
    • Re: Plasma Antennas, Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Plasma Antennas, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Plasma Antennas, Sal M. Onella
• Active receive 4 square and others, Denny
  • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Richard Clark
  • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Denny
  • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, art
      • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Richard Clark
    • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Jim Lux
      • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Allodoxaphobia
      • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Jim Lux
  • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Jim Lux
  • Re: Active receive 4 square and others, Dave Oldridge
• A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
  • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, art
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, art
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, art
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Dave
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Derek
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, art
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, art
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Helmut Wabnig
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, jimp
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Michael Coslo
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Cecil Moore
  • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Ross Tucker
  • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Wayne
    • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, AI4QJ
      • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Wayne
    • Re: A simple test to detrmine if you can understand a basic general relativity concept, Ed G
• Simple active antennas--DIY., John Smith
  • Re: Simple active antennas--DIY., John Smith
  • Re: Simple active antennas--DIY., John Smith
    • Re: Simple active antennas--DIY., John Smith
• reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Nick
  • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Rick
    • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Ed Cregger
      • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Richard Clark
    • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Ed Cregger
    • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, JERD
      • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Rick
      • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, ker2x
      • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, nm5k
  • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, Richard Clark
  • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, John Ferrell
  • Re: reducing chance of lightning hit on a vertical ?, nm5k
• When is a balanced feedline balanced?, John, N9JG
  • Re: When is a balanced feedline balanced?, Cecil Moore
  • Re: When is a balanced feedline balanced?, Roy Lewallen
• Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Priz
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Highland Ham
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Mike Kaliski
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Wayne
    • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Highland Ham
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Tam/WB2TT
    • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Priz
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Richard Harrison
  • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Priz
    • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, nm5k
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Wayne
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Priz
    • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Highland Ham
      • Re: Open Loop aka Dipole bent into a square, Cecil Moore
• Vertical Loading Coil, jgboyles
  • Re: Vertical Loading Coil, John Ferrell
    • Re: Vertical Loading Coil, jgboyles
• Inverted VEE Yagi antenna update, WA4SZE
  • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna update, Dave
• RE: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Richard Fry
  • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Richard Clark
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Michael Coslo
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Bob Bob
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Michael Coslo
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), J. Mc Laughlin
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Michael Coslo
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Michael Coslo
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Bob Bob
    • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Richard Fry
      • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Michael Coslo
  • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Stefan Wolfe
  • Re: Stefan Wolfe (semi-OT), Bob Bob
• Art: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
  • Re: Art: So What?, Richard Clark
    • Re: Art: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
  • Re: So What?, Dave
    • Re: So What?, Derek
      • Re: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: So What?, art
      • Re: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: So What?, Jimmie D
      • Re: So What?, Richard Fry
      • Re: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: So What?, art
      • Re: So What?, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: So What?, art
• Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, WA4SZE
  • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Dave
  • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Dave Heil
  • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Rick
    • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Rick
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, nm5k
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Denny
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Inverted VEE Yagi antenna, Cecil Moore
• Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
  • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
  • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Dave
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Derek
  • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
    • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, ltdoc
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Dave
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Harrison
    • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
    • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Fry
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jim Lux
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jim Lux
      • Re: Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ian White GM3SEK
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Part 2 Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
• Helix angles, art
  • Re: Helix angles, Richard Clark
  • Re: Helix angles, Richard Harrison
    • Re: Helix angles, Bruce in Alaska
  • Re: Helix angles, Richard Harrison
• Please help, SPAM FREE australia.radio.broadcast.moderated (Keitha)_
  • Re: Please help, Highland Ham
  • Re: Please help, ltdoc
    • Re: Please help, SPAM FREE australia.radio.broadcast.moderated (Keitha)_
• Probably a stupid question..., Dave
  • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Helmut Wabnig
    • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Allodoxaphobia
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Richard Clark
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Cecil Moore
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., ltdoc
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., ltdoc
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Cecil Moore
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Ed Cregger
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Richard Clark
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Cecil Moore
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., art
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., art
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Dave
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Richard Clark
      • Re: Probably a stupid question..., Michael Coslo
• a little 4nec2 help?, s . g . hatch
  • Re: a little 4nec2 help?, Jerry Martes
    • Re: a little 4nec2 help?, s . g . hatch
      • Re: a little 4nec2 help?, Jerry Martes
      • Re: a little 4nec2 help?, Jim Lux
      • Re: a little 4nec2 help?, s . g . hatch
• Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jim Lux
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Larry Benko
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Bert Hyman
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Mike Kaliski
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jim Lux
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Hal Rosser
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Hal Rosser
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Hal Rosser
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Highland Ham
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, art
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, ltdoc
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, ecregger
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jim Lux
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ralph Mowery
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Scott
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, K7ITM
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Bob Bob
    • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Tom Horne
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Bob Bob
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Richard Clark
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jerry Martes
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jerry Martes
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jerry Martes
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jerry Martes
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Jerry Martes
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Gerald . shipley
  • Re: Is it possible to ask questions here?, Cecil Moore
• OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, Guido
  • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, tclay
    • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, Guido
      • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, tclay
  • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, art
    • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, Guido
      • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, art
      • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, Guido
      • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, art
      • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, art
  • Re: OWA modeling and NEC-4 information, Jim Lux
• Scanner Antenna Lenth Tuning to 1/4 Wavelength Question ?, Robert11
  • Re: Scanner Antenna Lenth Tuning to 1/4 Wavelength Question ?, Richard Clark
  • Re: Scanner Antenna Lenth Tuning to 1/4 Wavelength Question ?, John Smith
    • Re: Scanner Antenna Lenth Tuning to 1/4 Wavelength Question ?, Highland Ham
  • From OP: Re: Scanner Antenna Lenth Tuning to 1/4 Wavelength Question ?, Robert11
• Looking for South Texas Hams, Secure Aspects Group
• Re: test only, Spam Trap
• Bonding help, scooterspal
  • Re: Bonding help, Jeff
    • Re: Bonding help, scooterspal
      • Re: Bonding help, Jim Lux
      • Re: Bonding help, w_tom
      • Re: Bonding help, Jim Lux
      • Re: Bonding help, Jim Lux
      • Re: Bonding help, w_tom
      • Re: Bonding help, Jim Lux
• Is this a loading coil?, James barrett
  • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Is this a loading coil?, H. P. Friedrichs
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, John Smith
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, ltdoc
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Richard Harrison
  • Re: Is this a loading coil?, H. Adam Stevens
    • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, H. Adam Stevens
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Dave
    • Re: Is this a loading coil?, art
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, John Smith
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, James Barrett
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, John Smith
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Jimmie D
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Dave
    • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Mike Coslo
  • Re: Is this a loading coil?, Sal M. Onella
  • Re: Is this a loading coil?, ltdoc
• Mobile antennas, art
  • Re: Mobile antennas, Jerry
• turns help, ml
  • Re: turns help, Denny
  • Re: turns help, Sal M. Onella
  • Re: turns help, Owen Duffy
• Software for VHF/UHF Magloop?, Lee
• How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, MRW
  • Re: How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, Barnard Peters
  • Re: How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, Richard Clark
    • Re: How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, Sal M. Onella
  • Re: How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, Jim Lux
    • Re: How do you determine the data rate capacity of a channel allocation?, MRW
• Vertical antenna problems, Scott . KB6CC
  • Re: Vertical antenna problems, Owen Duffy
    • Re: Vertical antenna problems, Scott . KB6CC
      • Re: Vertical antenna problems, Owen Duffy
      • Re: Vertical antenna problems, Denny
      • Re: Vertical antenna problems, Scott . KB6CC
• Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
  • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
    • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Fry
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Fry
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Fry
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Walter Maxwell
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Jimmie D
  • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Fry
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Mike Lucas
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Harrison
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Clark
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, art
  • Re: Distributed capacitance and antennas, Richard Harrison
• 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Robert M. Kimbrell
  • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Richard Clark
  • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Cecil Moore
    • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Denny
      • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Denny
    • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Robert M. Kimbrell
      • Re: 450 ohm feedline to a multiband vertical, Cecil Moore
• Better than the fan dipole, Tim Shoppa
  • Re: Better than the fan dipole, Cecil Moore
• Ham radio herd mentality, art
  • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, John Smith
    • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, John Smith
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Fry
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Fry
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Clark
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, John Smith
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Clark
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Clark
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Clark
    • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Spam Trap
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, nm5k
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, charlie
  • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Bob
    • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
  • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Harrison
    • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, art
      • Re: Ham radio herd mentality, Richard Harrison
• Re: Offering a part-time job, Sal M. Onella
  • Re: Offering a part-time job, K7ITM
    • Re: Offering a part-time job, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Offering a part-time job, Sal M. Onella
• Gaussian statics law again, art
  • Re: Gaussian statics law again, Richard Clark
• 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Rick
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Tam/WB2TT
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Clark
    • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Rick
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Fry
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Fry
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, nm5k
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Clark
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Clark
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Fry
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, nm5k
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Denny
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, nm5k
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Fry
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, nm5k
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Richard Fry
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Denny
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Cecil Moore
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Stefan Wolfe
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, tclay
  • Re: 80m Vertical over lossy soil, Dave Oldridge
• Swiveling BNC To BNC Connector ?, Robert11
  • Re: Swiveling BNC To BNC Connector ?, pdrahn@xxxxxxxxxx
• Watson Antennas Link ?, Robert11
  • Re: Watson Antennas Link ?, The Shadow
  • Re: Watson Antennas Link ?, Highland Ham
• Re: For Sale: SGC Automatic Antenna Tuner, byrne11
• An instructive antenna trick, Antonio Vernucci
  • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, John Smith
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Eric Oyen - N7ZZT
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Helmut Wabnig
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, David J Windisch
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, John Smith
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, John Smith
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Fry
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, John Smith
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Eric Oyen - N7ZZT
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Mike Kaliski
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, K7ITM
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Jimmie D
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, John Smith
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, N7ZZT - Eric Oyen
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
    • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
    • Re: An instructive antenna trick, J.B. Wood
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, J.B. Wood
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Cecil Moore
  • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Eric Oyen - N7ZZT
  • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Wimpie
    • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Clark
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Richard Harrison
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, art
    • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Antonio Vernucci
      • Re: An instructive antenna trick, Wimpie
• Re: quagi vs quad, Denny
  • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
    • Re: quagi vs quad, Jerry Martes
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jerry Martes
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jerry Martes
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
    • Re: quagi vs quad, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
  • Re: quagi vs quad, mcalhoun
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: quagi vs quad, Bob Bob
    • Re: quagi vs quad, Jimmie D
• Computer programs, art
  • Re: Computer programs, Dave
    • Re: Computer programs, art
      • Re: Computer programs, Jim Lux
    • Re: Computer programs, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Computer programs, Denny
      • Re: Computer programs, art
      • Re: Computer programs, Geoffrey S. Mendelson
      • Re: Computer programs, Dave
      • Re: Computer programs, Geoffrey S. Mendelson
      • Re: Computer programs, Dave
      • Re: Computer programs, Geoffrey S. Mendelson
      • Re: Computer programs, Highland Ham
      • Re: Computer programs, Dave
      • Re: Computer programs, Jim Lux
      • Re: Computer programs, Joel Koltner
      • Re: Computer programs, art
      • Re: Computer programs, Jim Lux
      • Re: Computer programs, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Computer programs, Jim Lux
    • Re: Computer programs, art
• Re: ANTENNA QUESTION, James Barrett
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ANTENNA QUESTION, James Barrett
  • Re: ANTENNA QUESTION, Bob Bob
  • antenna question, rb
    • Re: antenna question, Hal Rosser
  • Re: ANTENNA QUESTION, Rick Frazier
• Power supply question, Steve
  • Re: Power supply question, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: Power supply question, Jimmie D
      • Re: Power supply question, Steve
      • Re: Power supply question, Tam/WB2TT
  • Re: Power supply question, Dave
    • Re: Power supply question, Steve
      • Re: Power supply question, Highland Ham
      • Re: Power supply question, Steve
      • Re: Power supply question, Highland Ham
    • Re: Power supply question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Power supply question, Ralph Mowery
      • Re: Power supply question, Bryan
  • Re: Power supply question, Bob Miller
    • Re: Power supply question, Steve
      • Re: Power supply question, Cecil Moore
      • Re: Power supply question, Steve
  • Re: Power supply question, Spam Trap
    • Re: Power supply question, Steve
    • Re: Power supply question, Cecil Moore
  • Re: Power supply question, Gary wa7mlk
• Re: "Balancing" versus "cancelling", Richard Harrison
  • Re: "Balancing" versus "cancelling", art
• Re: Cushcraft R5/R7 Matching Network (MN-7) Rebuild, gb
  • Re: Cushcraft R5/R7 Matching Network (MN-7) Rebuild, gregory . beat
• RE:Braid, VK2KCE
  • Re: Braid, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Braid, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Braid, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Braid, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: Braid, art
      • Re: Braid, art
      • Re: Braid, art
      • Re: Braid, art
      • Re: Braid, art
      • Re: Braid, VK2KCE
• Re: rf pulse width measurement, Dave
• Fan Dipole insight, Tim Shoppa
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Fan Dipole insight, merlin-7
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, nm5k
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Roy Lewallen
    • Re: Fan Dipole insight, charlie
    • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Tim Shoppa
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, art
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, merlin-7
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Bob
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, John Ferrell
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, charlie
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Cecil Moore
    • Re: Fan Dipole insight, nm5k
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, nm5k
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Roy Lewallen
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, John Ferrell
  • Re: Fan Dipole insight, Highland Ham
• Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Denny
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., helmsman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Jim Higgins
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., art
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Jim Higgins
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Jim Higgins
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Bert Hyman
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Geoffrey S. Mendelson
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Message not available
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Roy Lewallen
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Cecil Moore
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., art
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Message not available
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Jim Higgins
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Christopher Cox
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
  • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
    • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., John Smith
      • Re: BPL draws more media attention ..., Dave Heil
• Re: antenna reflector, W2RAC
  • Re: antenna reflector, Roger (K8RI)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: antenna reflector, Richard Harrison
    • Re: antenna reflector, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: antenna reflector, Cecil Moore
      • Re: antenna reflector, Richard Harrison
      • Re: antenna reflector, Jim Lux
• Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Highland Ham
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, James Barrett
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Ian White GM3SEK
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: correction to question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Highland Ham
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Owen Duffy
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re(2): question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Richard Clark
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Richard Clark
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Denny
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Walter Maxwell
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, art
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Richard Harrison
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Irv Finkleman
      • Re: question about wire antenna and tuner, Cecil Moore
• For sell: Kenwood TS-450SAT + MC-60 + VHF DJ-190 + Pic keyer!!!, m0pkz
  • Re: For sell: Kenwood TS-450SAT + MC-60 + VHF DJ-190 + Pic keyer!!!, Spam Trap
• Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, smokey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Tom Horne
    • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Jerry
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Tom Horne
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Sal M. Onella
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, nm5k
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Yuri Blanarovich
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, nm5k
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Howard K0ACF
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Karl Beckman
    • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Jim Lux
  • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Tom Horne
    • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Supposed comparison of Mobile HF Antennas in November QST, Tom Horne
• WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, John, N9JG
  • Re: WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, Dave
    • Re: WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, yea right
      • Re: WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, Tam/WB2TT
      • Re: WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, Richard Fry
  • Re: WLW - 700 kHz, 500 kW, 100% modulation, no limiter, jawod
• Re: Distance between beams, Barrett
• Re: Homebrew Handheld Antennas, nm5k
  • Re: Homebrew Handheld Antennas, The Shadow
    • Re: Homebrew Handheld Antennas, maxpowervk
      • Re: Homebrew Handheld Antennas, Sal M. Onella
• Re: Dumb antenna height question, RBorowiak
  • Re: Dumb antenna height question, Highland Ham
    • Re: Dumb antenna height question, Jim Lux
      • Re: Dumb antenna height question, Roy Lewallen
      • Re: Dumb antenna height question, charlie
• Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Highland Ham
  • Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Steve
    • Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Bryan
      • Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Cecil Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Rick Frazier
  • Re: question about Yaesu FT-857D, Scott
• Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
    • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Gene Fuller
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
    • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Christopher Cox
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Roy Lewallen
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", H. Adam Stevens
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Tom Donaly
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Jim Kelley
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", J. B. Wood
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Clark
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", J. B. Wood
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Clark
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", J.B. Wood
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Clark
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", J.B. Wood
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Harrison
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Harrison
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", H. Adam Stevens
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", J.B. Wood
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Tom Donaly
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", K7ITM
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Tom Donaly
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Stefan Wolfe
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Richard Fry
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
  • Re: "Waves of Average Power", H. Adam Stevens
    • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Dave
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
  • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Stefan Wolfe
    • Re: "Waves of Average Power", H. Adam Stevens
  • Re: "Waves of Average Power", H. Adam Stevens
    • Re: "Waves of Average Power", Cecil Moore
      • Re: "Waves of Average Power", art

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(13)