Re: Sun noise
- From: Jim Lux <james.p.lux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:18:51 -0700
Owen Duffy wrote:
Dave Oldridge <doldridg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:Xns999897D777889doldridgsprintca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Near as I could measure it, the NF of the receiver after my mod was 1.2db. I had to resort to boiling and freezing water and a tiny dummy
load to measure it at all.
I haven't tried hot/cold tests using ice and boiling water, I didn't think it was practical.
You finally measured a receiver noise temperature of 50K with hot and cold loads of 270 and 370.
That means a Y factor of 1.059dB.
If Y were just 0.1dB greater, NF would be 0.78dB, 0.1dB lower and, NF would be 1.66dB.
With this configuration the sensitivity of NF to changes in Y are extreme, 0.4dB change in NF per 0.1dB change in Y around that point.
If you made the Y measurements using the audio output of a narrow band receiver, it is very hard to make high resolution measurements (eg to 0.01dB resolution) with say, a multimeter.
I have done these tests with a liquid nitrogen cooled load and room temperature load, and that gives more practical Y ratios, 3.7dB for a 1.2dBNF, and the sensitivity in NF is 0.08dB per 0.1dB change in Y. This still demands high resolution measurement of noise power.
Owen
Indeed, this would be a very challenging measurement, because you also have to take into account the match of that load, and if it's just a resistor that you're plunging into hot and cold, its resistance will almost certainly change. At microwave frequencies, a more common technique for radiometers is to use a flat plate absorber that has been characterized for changes in absorption over temperature.
One might want to take a look at how NIST does this kind of thing. Here's the slides from a talk by Jim Randa
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div818/81801/Noise/Talks/Noise%20Shrt%20Crs_06.pdf
he's a noise measurement guru at NIST.. check out the website:
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div818/81801/Noise/
I've had a precision noise source (used to do Y factor measurements on a precision 13.402 GHz receiver) measured in their lab over a week. The measurement uncertainty (for a system with waveguide connections) was in the few Kelvins range (out of a noise power of 7000K or so), and the connect/reconnect uncertainty dominates. I doubt one could get this kind of performance with a coaxial connector (the uncertainty in the mismatch).
By the way, a good noise diode source is probably a better standard for the hot side than heating a resistor. They're very, very stable over time, once calibrated, and if properly designed, have a very stable match as the noise is turned on and off. (that's what we were using in the above system, a temperature controlled Noise/Com style source).
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div818/81801/Noise/publications/01_Stability_IM.pdf
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div818/81801/Noise/publications/00_Stability_CPEM.pdf
describes the performance
Another useful link might be:
http://www.boulder.nist.gov/div818/81801/Noise/publications/97_Amps_IM.pdf
D.F. Wait, J. Randa, "Amplifier Noise Measurements at NIST", IEEE Trans on Inst. and Meas., v.46, n.2, Apr 1997
They give measurement uncertainties of 0.04dB on a 0.5 dB NF for 2-4 GHz..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sun noise
- From: Owen Duffy
- Re: Sun noise
- References:
- Sun noise
- From: Owen Duffy
- Re: Sun noise
- From: Dave Oldridge
- Re: Sun noise
- From: Owen Duffy
- Re: Sun noise
- From: Dave Oldridge
- Re: Sun noise
- From: Owen Duffy
- Sun noise
- Prev by Date: Re: Is an Antenna Analyzer an FCC violation?
- Next by Date: Re: Is an Antenna Analyzer an FCC violation?
- Previous by thread: Re: Sun noise
- Next by thread: Re: Sun noise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading