Re: Which modeler?
- From: "Jimmie D" <GFENDER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 05:49:46 -0400
"John Ferrell" <johnferrell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5ij633hdm84cmnrkdobt4q5a00u00nmqh0@xxxxxxxxxx
On 27 Apr 2007 13:37:26 -0700, weaver5511@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Apr 27, 8:31 pm, John Ferrell <johnferr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I should also add that the ARRL Course was pretty tough on my ego. I
EZNEChas a free demo. I compared that against what I could glean from
the advertising info of the other candidates.EZNECallows me to think
about antennas while I am using it rather than think about
programming.
EZNEChas saved me a lot of labor with my "antenna habit". EZNECand
Nittany Scientific products are used in the ARRL antenna course. That
course is a good value as well.
Thanks. I'll have a look at that ARRL course.
73, RDW
did not know nearly as much as I thought I did going into the course.
The up side is that it renewed my interest in antennas in general.
A humbling experience is sometimes a very good thing!
John Ferrell W8CCW
"Life is easier if you learn to
plow around the stumps"
I ve found there is a lot of disinformation on antennas and if you have
pretty much learned it on your own without very much interaction with others
you will be very much surprised about what you dont know. Probably true
about a lot of subjects.
Jimmie
.
- References:
- Which modeler?
- From: weaver5511
- Re: Which modeler?
- From: John Ferrell
- Re: Which modeler?
- From: weaver5511
- Re: Which modeler?
- From: John Ferrell
- Which modeler?
- Prev by Date: Re: Distributed capacitance effects Q?
- Next by Date: Re: Measuring Antenna Efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Which modeler?
- Next by thread: Re: Which modeler?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
