Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:53:05 GMT
Keith Dysart wrote:
A strange assertion given that in another thread your energy
analysis was incapable of producing any result while alternative
techniques could readily answer the question.
Strange that you are willing to accept your erroneous
results based on mixing virtual and physical reflection
coefficients in the same example. Your "alternative
techniques" yielded a bogus answer.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
.
- References:
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Keith Dysart
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Keith Dysart
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Prev by Date: Re: Energy Brain Teaser
- Next by Date: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Index(es):