Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: "Dave" <noone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2007 11:15:15 GMT
"Cecil Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:_lgPh.3345$YL5.605@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Keith Dysart wrote:and yet again you cross up terms... voltage and current are on wires. E and
Superposition of voltages and currents seems to be quite
accepted and is an excellent tool for circuit and transmission
line analysis.
Do you really expect us to believe that those voltages
and currents can exist without energy? Maybe an example
of EM voltage and EM current existing without ExB joules/sec
would help.
--
B are fields between or outside of wires. while they can be handled
similarly they should not be compared directly as you are asking. and yes,
there is at least one very good example of a voltage without ExB... just
charge a balloon up with some stray electrons and leave it alone long enough
to reach steady state... voila, E with no B. Please do this experiment and
reply when you have truly reached steady state.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Mike Lucas
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- References:
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Keith Dysart
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Prev by Date: Re: Revisiting the Power Explanation
- Next by Date: Re: Antenna Theory Question
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|