Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:10:06 -0500
Keith Dysart wrote:
Cecil Moore <nos...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Gene Fuller wrote:Even if you could separate
the forward and reverse waves the Poynting vector energy calculation
would still come out to exactly zero for each component as well as the
sum of the components.
Forward and reflected waves are easily separated by a
circulator so their existence is difficult to deny.
You always seem to like changing the experiment and then not
acting surprised when you get different results.
I don't see an experiment described in Gene's posting
so you must be describing yet another dream of yours.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
.
- References:
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Keith Dysart
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Gene Fuller
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Cecil Moore
- Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- From: Keith Dysart
- Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Prev by Date: analysis and hypothesis question?
- Next by Date: Re: analysis and hypothesis question?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Next by thread: Re: Is the Superposition Principle invalid?
- Index(es):