Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: "Reg Edwards" <g4fgq.regp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2006 12:06:21 +0100
model it asBut is it actually reflection?
no, it is actually a refraction. but it is useful sometimes to
a reflection from a slightly higher level. that makes computationof angles
of incidence and height a bit easier.
============================================
The trigonometry is quite simple. Things become complicated when the
reflecting layer is not horizontal, ie., the layer is tilted.
The angle and direction of tilt are very difficult to predict.
Consequently, where on the surface of the Earth a ray returns is
anybody's guess.
This makes the vertical take-off angle, reported by antenna modelling
programs, even less useful.
----
Reg.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: J. Mc Laughlin
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: Dave
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- References:
- HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: jawod
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: Richard Clark
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: Owen Duffy
- Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- From: Dave
- HFTA-ARRL-Space
- Prev by Date: Re: Affordable way for 1MHz - 4MHz capture and analysis??
- Next by Date: Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- Previous by thread: Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- Next by thread: Re: HFTA-ARRL-Space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|