Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: "Don T" <-painter-@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 06:00:57 GMT
Fire discipline must be practiced by all members of a newsgroup that hopes to survive invasion from trolls Harry. Trolls feed on the replies. Their entire raison d'etre is to provoke an outburst. From that they keep on posting their bull***. The military police newsgroup has a rotating "Sergeant at Arms" who gives the offending troll one warning to stay on topic and if the troll keeps shoveling *** the entire membership simply ignores all future postings by the troll. In this case we have a nymshifter hoping to personally insult people here, so far his main target has been you, and your responses give the poor child a semi-hardon because he knows he got to you. He reads your responses with his *** in his hand whacking away at that sad limp member hoping to finally get it fully up and off. If you just flat do -not- respond to the limp*** sack of monkey-*** you take all his pleasure away. Pretty soon, when he gets no responses to his feeble posturing, he tires of it and seeks more fertile ground to foist his fraud off on. I believe we have enough pure pyrotechnics readers here that the invasion will soon fail. Just give it time to work. "The Silence" is unbearable to these dickheads.
I formally move that no further responses be posted to "Joe Smith" and any other of his transparent nyms that show up in the near future.
--
Don Thompson
There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.
~Goethe
It is a worthy thing to fight for one's freedom;
it is another sight finer to fight for another man's.
~Mark Twain
<hhc314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1152849524.106818.60350@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Don, I tend to agree with you on that, because the absence of defensive
fire was actually what resulted in the deaths of the newsgroups that I
cited. I believe that each of this posted on some of these newsgroups
at one time or anothers. but doubt that either of us reads any of them
today, although the newgroups themselved still exist.
Remember what the Army, Navy and Marines preached? It is equally true
today as it was then.
Pardon me for my poor French Don, but I have to respect at all for
these little but fart that come on to this fireworks newsgroupd to
preach and post their political ***, particulary since none of them
have ever been in 'in country' while being forbiden to share with ever
there wives where they were. While I graduate the Engineer Corps ROTC
and have a commison in the Army, because opf "critical skills" I have
never served in that capacity, but as that of a civilian contractor,
who unfortunately was forbibidden from carrieng a wepon. You know the
drill.
Don, just guess what my reaction to thise little but fucks, where the
best part of them ran down their mother's leg. In fact, the majority of
thse little but *** have never come withing a red *** hair of knowing
a real woman, who they would want to mate their companion for life and
the mother of their children.
Damn, I am starting to sound like a Marine! Sadly I'm nor, but I would
really like to be a member of their exclusive club, or that of the Navy
Seals. Don, perhaps I live in a very unique circles of friends, becaise
most of mine, as probably yours, have risked their lives in harms way
many time, and in either military uniform or civilian attire have borne
the cost. You know precisely what I mean here.
Don, what I donate to charity is from my now fixed income. Most of the
suplus from living expenses goes to the Masonic Home, the Salvation
Army and the DAV. Sadly, much is not left to donate to the fireworks
foundation. Forgive me for that, but that's simply the way I
prioritize things.
Kindest regards, and don't ever let the turkeys posting her get you
down.
Kindest regards, Harry C.
Don T wrote:Maintain fire discipline.
--
Don Thompson
There is nothing more frightening than active ignorance.
~Goethe
It is a worthy thing to fight for one's freedom;
it is another sight finer to fight for another man's.
~Mark Twain
<hhc314@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152843598.382555.239200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Logical enough Tom, but after seeing 4 of my favorite nesgroups go down
> the drain, I'm likely overly (you pick the terminology).
>
> Tom, just for fun to take a look at these newsgroups and the posts now
> on them. The worst case in a newsgroup called sci.physics, where I was
> actually aprehensive about posting there, becasue the level of
> knowledge of the posters was so intimidating to me, and I'm a graduate
> physicist! Take a quick look at the vast majority of posts on that
> newsgroup today, simply as a result of nobody raising a red flag.
> Other once interesting newsgroups WERE:
>
> sci.physics.fusion (Where once the concept of cold fusion was
> seriously discussed, often with the the physicist Steve Jones -- who
> actually coined the term 'Cold Fusion' and co-author of the famous
> 'Jones and Palmer' paper from IIRC BYU...today you won't find any
> educated people posting there.
>
> sci.energy.hydrogen....Which at one time was an interesting place to
> play and debate various aspect of crackpottery. Silly, but fun.
>
> Sadly, when the older curmudgons like Uncle All either departed or
> died, these newsgroups simply fell apart and died as well. They have
> simply been taken over by the crackpots who for the most part simply
> transmit, but have there receivers turned off. This makes it difficult
> to have an interesting discussion.
>
> Tom, I simply don't want to see rec.pyrotechnics suffer the identical
> fate, particularly now that with Homeland Security, it seems that
> everyone is coming down on the real fireworks guys. This is the last
> newsgroup to my knowledge that fireworks/pyrotechnics is freely
> discussed, hence I really don't want to see it lost to the crackpot
> posters. Actually, I would in preference like to see it taken over by
> the "kewl bomz dudes", but that's pretty extreme.
>
> I'll keep my mouth shut with this Joe Smith guy, if you really believe
> that would be the best option. Still, the consideration is how to keep
> the newsgroup free of the swarm of rats that will follow him here?
>
> Your call.
>
> Kindest regards, Harry C.
>
>
> fargowest@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> Harry,
>>
>> There's a place overlooking the Hudson River that has practiced for
>> many years a small bit of discipline that can be employed here to good
>> effect. When a cadet at West Point is found wanting in certain areas >> of
>> conduct, fellow cadets and upperclassmen will "silence" him. >> Silencing?
>> No one communicates (except for those terse exchanges that >> characterize
>> formal military conduct) with the offending party. Period.
>>
>> Simple, elegant and brutal in its cumulative effect, it is just the
>> medicine needed here as the just-now lengthening queue of mixed loons
>> gathers about you and others, looking for an opening. Let their >> threads
>> perish where they start: no comment, no debate. When enough of them >> are
>> discovered to be orphans, they'll soon tire of their puerile sport and
>> seek more fertile pastures elsewhere. Verily, they thrive upon the
>> noise.
>>
>> All that's required is discipline. This NG is an open forum but that
>> does not mean that you and others must suffer the foolishness of some
>> folks (and the piffle they bring with them) without recourse.
>>
>> It's been said that the devil hates silence. Shall we endeavor to
>> create some about the heads of them that would prattle on, forever off
>> topic, endlessly?
>>
>> Not a bit the curmudgeon,
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>>
>>
>> hhc314@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > OK, the flood gate doors have now opened, thanks to Joe Smith, and
>> > unless Laura is pulling our chain, the newsgroup rec.pyrotechnic >> > will
>> > likely be unreadable in less than three months.
>> >
>> > Joe Smith has blasted his mindless crackpottery over many wacko
>> > newsgroups, and now the idiots that read these newsgroups are >> > beginning
>> > to respond.
>> >
>> > On the sidelines, good old Joe is likely sitting there laughing,
>> > knowing what the results of his posts would be. Unfortunately, the
>> > crackpots on the newsgroups far outnumber readers focused on >> > fireworks
>> > as a hobby.
>> >
>> > Hell has a very special place for guys like Joe Smith, or else I >> > hope
>> > it does.
>> >
>> > Harry C.
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: tes
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- References:
- Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: Laura
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: fargowest
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: Don T
- Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- From: hhc314@xxxxxxxxx
- Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- Prev by Date: Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- Next by Date: Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- Previous by thread: Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- Next by thread: Re: Dear Paul, July 12, 2006, updated, July 13, 2006, updated
- Index(es):
Loading