Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- From: robgood@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 10:15:13 -0700
Mick wrote:
> I suppose so, but you would have to buy retail goods and still couldn't
> make them yourself.
So you'd get licensed for manufacture too, then sell them to yourself
as retailer, and then again to yourself as consumer.
> Have you read what I've posted? If so, do you think I'm wrong, or not?
I'm guessing you're right, so far. However, there may be other
statutes with "notwithstanding" provisions that could exempt you from
the application of this statute under some circumstances. For
instance, if you're doing chemistry experiments for research or
education, there may be an exemption for you to work with explosives
and/or incendiaries. That may require some sort of accreditation of
your lab, but that may be easier than a firework mfg. license.
It is also likely that the "intended" in the definition of "fireworks"
is meant to be read as a claim on a commercial product, and that items
you make for yourself aren't legally considered "intended" for
anything. In that case whatever you make is not a firework unless you
intend to sell it or to use it in a display business.
Robert
.
- References:
- No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- From: Mick
- Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- From: robgood
- Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- From: Mick
- No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- Prev by Date: Re: White Smoke help?
- Next by Date: Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- Previous by thread: Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- Next by thread: Re: No constitutional rights in Oregon?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|