Re: "Time for Striking"
- From: Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 09:22:33 +0000
Simon Tatham said:
Richard Heathfield <rjh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Let the time taken for the bell to ring be B.
Let the interval between rings be I.
For four bells, the total time taken is B + 3(B + I).
But the puzzle talked about the time taken for the clock to
_strike_. I put it to you that immediately after the last ring has
started, the clock has finished all the actual striking, regardless
of how long the bell continues to resonate.
Fine - let the time taken for the clock to strike be B, and the time between
the end of one strike and the start of the next be I.
It's a valid correction, Simon, but it doesn't change the outcome.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
Google users: <http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Time for Striking"
- From: Mike
- Re: "Time for Striking"
- From: Mensanator
- Re: "Time for Striking"
- References:
- "Time for Striking"
- From: aarklon
- Re: "Time for Striking"
- From: Richard Heathfield
- Re: "Time for Striking"
- From: Simon Tatham
- "Time for Striking"
- Prev by Date: Re: "Time for Striking"
- Next by Date: Re: A puzzle for Texas Hold'em fans
- Previous by thread: Re: "Time for Striking"
- Next by thread: Re: "Time for Striking"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|