Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- From: Topi Linkala <nes@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:58:45 +0300
Ted Schuerzinger wrote:
Chappy <petergregorychapman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:1182934892.140565.126480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Enigma 1441 - The missing link
New Scientist magazine, 5 May 2007.
by Susan Denham.
I sent in the Enigma below, and it was
accepted for publication.
Unfortunately in the meantime the digit that
should have been printed in the shaded
square [original shading replaced with a
"?"] has become smudged and is illegible.
However, that should not stop you doing the
puzzle. Please send in the intended answer
to the original puzzle.
I have a feeling this implies that we have to find a digit for the ? such that there is only one valid solution....
If so, then it cannot be 1 as both my and jimmy's solution has 1 in there and they are different.
I try to find a solution that doesn't have 1 in that square.
Topi
--
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are
always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts."
- Bertrand Russell
"How come he didn't put 'I think' at the end of it?" - Anonymous
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- From: Marc Dashevsky
- Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- References:
- Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- From: Chappy
- Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- From: Ted Schuerzinger
- Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- Prev by Date: Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- Next by Date: Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- Previous by thread: Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- Next by thread: Re: Enigma 1441 - The missing link
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|