Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:49:40 +0000 (UTC)
Phil wrote:
) Willem <willem@xxxxxxxx> writes:
)> Phil wrote:
) ...
)> ) Have another look, you seem to be looking at it the wrong way...
) ...
)> So what did I do wrong ?
)
) Wrong? Not much at all. I did say "incomplete".
)
)> Or alternatively, what unspoken assumption have I made ?
)
) That there's only one way round the circuit.
I haven't made that assumption. On the contrary, what I assumed is
that either way round the circuit will generate a solution, if one
exists, so that it is irrelevant to the question which way round to go.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- References:
- Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: anil197
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Willem
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Willem
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Willem
- Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- From: Phil Carmody
- Puzzle on Shortest distance
- Prev by Date: Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- Next by Date: Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- Previous by thread: Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- Next by thread: Re: Puzzle on Shortest distance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|