Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- From: "Mark J. Tilford" <tilford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:13:40 GMT
On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 10:01:03 -0000, Mark Brader <msb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> "Ramkumar" writes:
>> A modern though little realised example of undecimal counting (i.e
>> based on 11) is seen in the ISBN of published books. Any ISBN comprises
>> ten digits. If you multiply the first by ten, the second by nine, the
>> third by eight, and so on, summing the results as you go along, the
>> result will always be divisible by eleven.
>>
>> Any special reasons why ISBN follows this?
>
> It allows the detection of any single-digit error and any transposition
> of two adjacent digits. This is better than the Luhn checksum, which
> does not detect the transposition of an adjacent 0 and 9.
I'm pretty sure that the ISBN method also detects any transposition of any
two nonadjacent digits.
--
------------------------
Mark Jeffrey Tilford
tilford@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- From: Mark Brader
- Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- References:
- ISBN & undecimal counting
- From: Ramkumar
- Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- From: Mark Brader
- ISBN & undecimal counting
- Prev by Date: Re: Does this card game sound familiar?? HELP!
- Next by Date: Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- Previous by thread: Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- Next by thread: Re: ISBN & undecimal counting
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading