Re: SCWC 86 results
- From: "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 19:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
On Aug 1, 4:53 pm, Brian Westley <west...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Flying Tortoise <purple....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Aug 1, 2:19=A0pm, Steve Ball <pretty.g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Flying Tortoise:
On Jul 30, 9:47=A0am, Steve Ball <pretty.g...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Flying Tortoise:
s=B9Dropped off outside riotous hustings, I was recognised (13)
DI(HUSTINGSI anagram)ED
Pretty well done. My only quibble is the use of the past tense =8Cwa=
to introduce the definition.
I hate to quibble over a quibble but I kinda have to point out that
DISTINGUISHED, whether as verb or participle, is past tense!
oIn the cryptic reading, it's just a word. The moderator is objecting t=
n't"[wordplay] _was_ [definition]", when it still is. "Is" obviously does=
Iwork in the surface; what about "Dropped off outside riotous hustings,=
might be recognised (13)"? Works for me.
Then he is mistaken in his interpretation. "Was recognised" is the
definition in toto. The "was" is not in any sense a linking word.
Huh? Can you give me an example where "distinguished" is synonymous withProbably not. But I said already the justification is a 'tad
"was recognised"?
contrived', namely that one is distinguished because one was
recognised.
How about:
"He distinguished red from green in the colorblindness test yesterday"
distinguished = recognized: no problem. distinguished = was
recognized: problem.
.
- References:
- Re: SCWC 86 results
- From: Steve Ball
- Re: SCWC 86 results
- From: Flying Tortoise
- Re: SCWC 86 results
- From: Brian Westley
- Re: SCWC 86 results
- Prev by Date: Re: SCWC 86 results
- Next by Date: Re: SCWC 86 results
- Previous by thread: Re: SCWC 86 results
- Next by thread: Re: SCWC 86 results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading