Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise <purple.mug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:18:53 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 31, 8:35 pm, m...@xxxxxxx (Mark Brader) wrote:
Barry Etheridge:
Ah, right, thank-you. OP is strictly speaking right but it is a very
fine distinction. I suspect that many self-appointed atheists are in
truth of the alternative persuasion in reality, for example.
Phil Rose:
Anyway what has being atheist to do with it? As an atheist (in the sense
of not caring whether there is a God or not - that's not really
agnostic is it) I still have a set of morals.
Barry Etheridge:
It would take a very corkscrew approach to what I was discussing to
suggest that I in any way linked atheist and amoral or immoral except
in a purely syntactic manner.
Thanks for proving that you *are* a troll. Plonk.
--
Are you on drugs or just mad as a bucket of frogs? No plonk for you.
At your most barking you're just too damned amusing!
.
- References:
- Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Ian Woodrow
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Phil Rose
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Mark Brader
- Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Prev by Date: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|