Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise <purple.mug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 12:30:34 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 30, 5:43 pm, "rthea...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <rthea...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 30 Jan, 16:27, Flying Tortoise <purple....@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah, right, thank-you. OP is strictly speaking right but it is a very
fine distinction. I suspect that many self-appointed atheists are in
truth of the alternative persuasion in reality, for example.
Is there any other way to be an atheist?
Roy
There's only one way to be an atheist but few 'atheists' are on it!
Sadly the English language doesn't have a word for this 'third way',
though anti-theist gets a bit nearer, but that merely proves my point
that, in practice, there is usually very little distinction made
between the 'a' and the 'un', 'in' and 'im' prefixes.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Phil Rose
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- References:
- Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Ian Woodrow
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Rodders
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: Flying Tortoise
- Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Prev by Date: Re: SCWC 47 - Entries thread
- Next by Date: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Previous by thread: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Next by thread: Re: Glasgow Herald 30th Jan. Dodgy answer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|