rec.puzzles.crosswords

• Date Index

---

• Tough Glasgow Herald today, Dave Baker
• A Quinian Crossword Puzzle, Mark Iredell
  • A Quinian Crossword Puzzle (likely spoiler), Mark Iredell
• Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), google
  • *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), Dr Ivan D. Reid
    • Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), mUs1Ka
      • Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), Dr Ivan D. Reid
    • Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), google
  • Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec), John Dean
• Do you have a favorite crossword site or suggestion?, thera_gwynne
  • Re: Do you have a favorite crossword site or suggestion?, Offramp
• Hi, I'm back again..., bashbranagan
  • Re: Hi, I'm back again..., Tim Downie
    • Re: Hi, I'm back again..., bashbranagan
• Explanation please?, warren montgomery
  • Re: Explanation please?, Derek Wills
  • Re: Explanation please?, Mark Brader
    • Re: Explanation please?, Dr Ivan D. Reid
• 'to' or 'too'?, Ian Hooksem
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, mUs1Ka
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Adrian Bailey
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Mark Iredell
    • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Pete Maclean
      • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Mark Brader
    • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Uncle Yap
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Ilan Caron
    • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Rishi
  • Re: 'to' or 'too'?, Ian Hooksem
• Please explain ........, Joe Boy
  • Re: Please explain ........, Gordon Murray
    • Re: Please explain ........, Joe Boy
• Times Jumbo today?, CJ
  • Re: Times Jumbo today?, CJ
• Stuck on two, Dave Baker
  • Re: Stuck on two, Bart C
    • Re: Stuck on two, Dave Baker
  • Re: Stuck on two, Mark Brader
    • Re: Stuck on two, Dave Tilley
      • Re: Stuck on two, RUFUS
• Help please!, Hairy Belly
  • Re: Help please!, Gordon Murray
    • Re: Help please!, Hairy Belly
• SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea, Pete Maclean
  • Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea, robkingston
  • Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea, Mark Brader
    • Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea, vinyl1
      • Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea, Mark Brader
• SCWC 45, Pete Maclean
  • Re: SCWC 45, Mark Brader
    • Re: SCWC 45, Rishi
  • Re: SCWC 45, Ilan Caron
  • Re: SCWC 45, Mark Iredell
  • Re: SCWC 45, vinyl1
  • Re: SCWC 45, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: SCWC 45, vinit
  • Re: SCWC 45, robkingston
  • Re: SCWC 45, google
  • Re: SCWC 45, google
• Prize Crossword No. 24267 set by Araucaria, Uncle Yap
• Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*, Steve Ball
  • Re: Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*, Gordon Murray
    • Re: Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*, Steve Ball
• Free Christmas Crossword, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: Free Christmas Crossword, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: Free Christmas Crossword, Offramp
    • Re: Free Christmas Crossword, Peter Biddlecombe
• Herald clue explanation, Dave Baker
  • Re: Herald clue explanation, Mark Iredell
    • Re: Herald clue explanation, Steve Ball
• Glasgow Herald 19/12, Dave Baker
  • Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12, warren montgomery
    • Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12, Dave Baker
      • Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12, Phil Rose
      • Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12, warren montgomery
• PVPCWC 48 - The results, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Offramp
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Mark Brader
    • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Jeremy C B Nicoll
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Mark Brader
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Jeremy C B Nicoll
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Steve Ball
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results, Mark Iredell
• SCWC 44 - the result, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the result, MMCL
    • Re: SCWC 44 - the result, Pete Maclean
• SCWC 44 - the analysis, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Steve Ball
    • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Mark Brader
    • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Steve Ball
    • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Flying Tortoise
      • Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis), Mark Brader
      • Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis), Pete Maclean
      • Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis), Steve Ball
      • Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis), Uncle Yap
      • Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis), Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Phil Rose
    • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, Duke
  • Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis, google
• SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, colin . blackburn
  • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, colin . blackburn
    • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, Rishi
      • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, colin . blackburn
      • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, Rishi
    • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER, colin . blackburn
• Today's Glasgow Herald, Dave Baker
  • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Dave Baker
      • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, google
      • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Dave Baker
      • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Dancing Ant
      • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Dave Baker
      • Re: Today's Glasgow Herald, Peter Biddlecombe
• Clue duplication, Brian
  • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: Clue duplication, Chris Shore
  • Re: Clue duplication, Jeffrey Turner
  • Re: Clue duplication, grabber
    • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, CJ
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Clue duplication, Phil Rose
      • Re: Clue duplication, Rishi
      • Re: Clue duplication, colin . blackburn
    • Re: Clue duplication, Peter Biddlecombe
• Listener 3959 query, Tim Downie
  • Re: Listener 3959 query, Offramp
    • Re: Listener 3959 query, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Listener 3959 query, Offramp
      • Re: Listener 3959 query, Offramp
  • Re: Listener 3959 query, Tim Downie
• PVPCWC 48 - New Voting Deadline, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - New Voting Deadline, Flying Tortoise
• SCWC44 - New Deadline!, Flying Tortoise
• Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Tim Downie
  • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Tim Downie
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Tim Downie
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Flying Tortoise
    • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Dave Baker
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Tim Downie
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Dave Baker
      • Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!, Tim Downie
• Fifteensquared, Rishi
  • Re: Fifteensquared, neildubya
    • Re: Fifteensquared, Rishi
• Times - crossword club re-registration, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, colin . blackburn
  • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, John Dean
    • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, Phil Rose
  • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, Uncle Yap
  • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, vinyl1
  • Re: Times - crossword club re-registration, Brian
• PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details, Mark Brader
    • Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details, Flying Tortoise
• Guardian 24,249, John Dean
  • Re: Guardian 24,249, Mike Robson
    • Re: Guardian 24,249, John Dean
      • Re: Guardian 24,249, Dave Baker
      • Re: Guardian 24,249, Chris Shore
  • Re: Guardian 24,249, Brian Skinner
  • Re: Guardian 24,249, Dave Baker
    • Re: Guardian 24,249, Flying Tortoise
• w00t!, Phil Rose
  • Re: w00t!, Mark Iredell
• [OT] Please excuse test post, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: [OT] Please excuse test post, Jeremy C B Nicoll
    • Re: [OT] Please excuse test post, vinyl1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [OT] Please excuse test post, Jim Warren
    • Re: [OT] Please excuse test post, Angus Rodgers
• PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Flying Tortoise
    • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Mark Brader
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, mUs1Ka
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Mark Brader
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Mark Brader
• In a sorry state, Rishi
  • Re: In a sorry state, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: In a sorry state, Steven Gibbs
  • Re: In a sorry state, Dave Baker
    • Re: In a sorry state, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: In a sorry state, Dave Baker
      • Re: In a sorry state, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: In a sorry state, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: In a sorry state, Steve Ball
• Three Down, Martin Willett
• Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Offramp
  • Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Mark Brader
  • Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Andrew B.
• Don't understand answer., whileurup
  • Re: Don't understand answer., Dave Baker
    • Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Don't understand answer., MMCL
  • Re: Don't understand answer., Ed Enstrom
    • Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Don't understand answer., Flying Tortoise
      • Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Don't understand answer., henri
• ACC 228 - The result, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC 228 - The result, Vari L. Cinicke
• ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Jeremy C B Nicoll
  • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Mark Brader
  • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Steve Ball
    • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Andrew B.
    • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Andrew B.
      • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Steve Ball
  • ACC 228 - postscript, Mark Iredell
    • Re: ACC 228 - postscript, Jeremy C B Nicoll
  • Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Mark Brader
  • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, thera_gwynne
• Rules and Regulations, John K Masters
  • Re: Rules and Regulations, Flying Tortoise
    • Re: Rules and Regulations, Derek Wills
      • Re: Rules and Regulations, Rishi
      • Re: Rules and Regulations, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: Rules and Regulations, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Rules and Regulations, Rishi
    • Re: Rules and Regulations, John K Masters
    • Re: Rules and Regulations, Gail Koontz
• Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
  • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Flying Tortoise
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
      • Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter T. Daniels
• ACC 228 - the clues, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC 228 - the clues, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• SCWC44 - entries only, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
      • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, MMCL
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Mark Brader
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Mark Iredell
    • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Rishi
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Phil Rose
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Vari L. Cinicke
    • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, robkingston
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Pete Maclean
    • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Duke
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, John K Masters
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, MMCL
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, vinyl1
  • Re: SCWC44 - entries only, google
• SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Andrew B.
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Uncle Yap
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Mark Iredell
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Rishi
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Flying Tortoise
• 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Ian Woodrow
  • Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, henri
  • Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Dave Baker
  • Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Old Timer
    • Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Ian Woodrow
• Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?, Ian Woodrow
  • Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?, Peter Biddlecombe
• The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Vari L. Cinicke
  • Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Vari L. Cinicke
    • Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Angus Rodgers
• A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Frangipani
  • Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Uncle Yap
  • Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Frangipani
• Re: Nov 29th Glasgow Herald, Ian Woodrow
• SCWC 44: looking ahead, Rishi
  • Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead, Rishi
    • Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead, Flying Tortoise
• SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
  • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
    • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
    • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Steve Ball
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Uncle Yap
    • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
    • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, phh
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Phil Rose
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Brian Skinner
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Ilan Caron
    • Re: SCWC 43: the winner, colin . blackburn
• WaPo Style Invitational Week 742: Clue Us In, Mark Iredell
• ACC228 - an example or two, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Phil Rose
• Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Michael Peake
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, mUs1Ka
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
  • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Andrew B.
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
  • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Pete Maclean
    • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Vari L. Cinicke
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Father Ignatius
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Chris Lear
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Pete Maclean
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: ACC 228 - A spot of Brunch!, Flying Tortoise
• ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
    • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, ebunn
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
      • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, ebunn
  • Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
• From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Jordan
  • Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Dave Baker
  • Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Brian Skinner
    • Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Dave Baker
• SCWC 43: clue list, Rishi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
    • Re: SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
      • Re: SCWC 43: Clue list, Angus Rodgers
  • SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
• Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
  • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
    • Re: Times no, 23,758, Uncle Yap
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Uncle Yap
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
    • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
      • Re: Times no, 23,758, Brian
    • Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
    • Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
  • Re: Times no, 23,758, Phil Rose
• Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0, Angus Rodgers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0, colin . blackburn
• PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!), Flying Tortoise
  • Re: PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!), Flying Tortoise
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, ebunn
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
    • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Mark Brader
      • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
      • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Mark Brader
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Flying Tortoise
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Father Ignatius
    • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, henri
      • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Father Ignatius
      • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Peter Biddlecombe
  • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Phil Rose
    • Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Jim Tait

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(18)