rec.puzzles.crosswords

• Thread Index

---

• Tough Glasgow Herald today
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: google
• Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• A Quinian Crossword Puzzle (likely spoiler)
  • From: Mark Iredell
• A Quinian Crossword Puzzle
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: John Dean
• Re: *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: mUs1Ka
• *SPOILER* Re: Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Guardian 24269 (Thu 27 Dec)
  • From: google
• Re: Do you have a favorite crossword site or suggestion?
  • From: Offramp
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Ian Hooksem
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: google
• Do you have a favorite crossword site or suggestion?
  • From: thera_gwynne
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: thera_gwynne
• Re: Hi, I'm back again...
  • From: bashbranagan
• Re: Hi, I'm back again...
  • From: Tim Downie
• Hi, I'm back again...
  • From: bashbranagan
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Explanation please?
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Ilan Caron
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Explanation please?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Explanation please?
  • From: Derek Wills
• Explanation please?
  • From: warren montgomery
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Adrian Bailey
• Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: mUs1Ka
• 'to' or 'too'?
  • From: Ian Hooksem
• Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: google
• Re: SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea
  • From: robkingston
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: robkingston
• Re: Stuck on two
  • From: RUFUS
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: vinit
• Re: Please explain ........
  • From: Joe Boy
• Re: Please explain ........
  • From: Gordon Murray
• Please explain ........
  • From: Joe Boy
• Re: Times Jumbo today?
  • From: CJ
• Times Jumbo today?
  • From: CJ
• Re: Stuck on two
  • From: Dave Tilley
• Re: Stuck on two
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Stuck on two
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Stuck on two
  • From: Bart C
• Stuck on two
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: google
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Help please!
  • From: Hairy Belly
• Re: Help please!
  • From: Gordon Murray
• Help please!
  • From: Hairy Belly
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: Ilan Caron
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: Rishi
• Re: SCWC 45
  • From: Mark Brader
• SCWC 45 - comments, bonus clues and miscellanea
  • From: Pete Maclean
• SCWC 45
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Prize Crossword No. 24267 set by Araucaria
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*
  • From: Gordon Murray
• Stickler 2794 *Spoilers*
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Free Christmas Crossword
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Duke
• Re: Free Christmas Crossword
  • From: Offramp
• Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: Free Christmas Crossword
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Free Christmas Crossword
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC 44 - the result
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Re: Herald clue explanation
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Herald clue explanation
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis)
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Herald clue explanation
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Re: SCWC 44 - the result
  • From: MMCL
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: warren montgomery
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: warren montgomery
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis)
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: CJ
• Glasgow Herald 19/12
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis)
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis)
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Offramp
• Hidden words and pronunciation (was: SCWC 44 - the analysis)
  • From: Mark Brader
• PVPCWC 48 - The results
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Steve Ball
• SCWC 44 - the result
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• SCWC 44 - the analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: The Last Danish Pastry
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: grabber
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - New Voting Deadline
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Dancing Ant
• Re: Listener 3959 query
  • From: Offramp
• Re: Listener 3959 query
  • From: Offramp
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Jeffrey Turner
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: Rishi
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Chris Shore
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: google
• Re: SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: colin . blackburn
• SCWC 43 Redux and Everyman 3194 SPOILER
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: Listener 3959 query
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Clue duplication
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Today's Glasgow Herald
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Listener 3959 query
  • From: Tim Downie
• Clue duplication
  • From: Brian
• Re: Listener 3959 query
  • From: Offramp
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Ilan Caron
• Listener 3959 query
  • From: Tim Downie
• PVPCWC 48 - New Voting Deadline
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• SCWC44 - New Deadline!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: Brian
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Tim Downie
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Tim Downie
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Tim Downie
• Re: Fifteensquared
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Tim Downie
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Wee Stinker 10/12/07 - clue driving me crazy!
  • From: Tim Downie
• Re: Fifteensquared
  • From: neildubya
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Fifteensquared
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: John Dean
• Re: [OT] Please excuse test post
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Times - crossword club re-registration
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: [OT] Please excuse test post
  • From: Jim Warren
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• PVPCWC 48 - Clues and voting details
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Chris Shore
• Re: [OT] Please excuse test post
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: [OT] Please excuse test post
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: John Dean
• Re: w00t!
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Brian Skinner
• Re: Guardian 24,249
  • From: Mike Robson
• Guardian 24,249
  • From: John Dean
• w00t!
  • From: Phil Rose
• [OT] Please excuse test post
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: henri
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: mUs1Ka
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Steven Gibbs
• Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!)
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: In a sorry state
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• In a sorry state
  • From: Rishi
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: google
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Three Down
  • From: Martin Willett
• Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?
  • From: Offramp
• Re: ACC 228 - The result
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Rishi
• Re: ACC 228 - postscript
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• ACC 228 - postscript
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Ed Enstrom
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: MMCL
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Jeremy C B Nicoll
• Re: Don't understand answer.
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: vinyl1
• Don't understand answer.
  • From: whileurup
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• ACC 228 - The result
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• ACC 228 - The Analysis
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: MMCL
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Gail Koontz
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: John K Masters
• Merv Griffin's Crosswords
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Derek Wills
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Rules and Regulations
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Rules and Regulations
  • From: John K Masters
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: John K Masters
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Duke
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Brian Skinner
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Michael Peake
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Rishi
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: robkingston
• Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Times 23,764 - I just knew it!
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: ACC 228 - the clues
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• ACC 228 - the clues
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?
  • From: Frangipani
• Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue
  • From: Old Timer
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Rishi
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue
  • From: henri
• Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: MMCL
• Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• SCWC44 - entries only
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0
  • From: colin . blackburn
• Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Jim Tait
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• A bit non-PC for Guardian?
  • From: Frangipani
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC228 - an example or two
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Phil Rose
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Chris Lear
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: henri
• Re: Nov 29th Glasgow Herald
  • From: Ian Woodrow
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Pete Maclean
• SCWC 44: looking ahead
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: phh
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Steve Ball
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: phh
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: phh
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: phh
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: phh
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: phh
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Pete Maclean
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: ebunn
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: ebunn
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Rishi
• SCWC 43: the winner
  • From: Rishi
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC228 - an example or two
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: ACC228 - an example or two
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• WaPo Style Invitational Week 742: Clue Us In
  • From: Mark Iredell
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Andrew B.
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: mUs1Ka
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC228 - an example or two
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Dr Ivan D. Reid
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• ACC228 - an example or two
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Vari L. Cinicke
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Brian
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: ACC 228 - A spot of Brunch!
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter T. Daniels
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: SCWC 43: Clue list
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Uncle Yap
• Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106
  • From: Brian Skinner
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Father Ignatius
• Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106
  • From: Dave Baker
• From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106
  • From: Jordan
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: Peter Biddlecombe
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Mark Brader
• Re: SCWC 43: Clue list
  • From: Rishi
• SCWC 43: Clue list
  • From: Rishi
• SCWC 43: Clue list
  • From: Rishi
• SCWC 43: clue list
  • From: Rishi
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: Times no, 23,758
  • From: vinyl1
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Dave Baker
• Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0
  • From: Angus Rodgers
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!)
  • From: Flying Tortoise
• Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?
  • From: ebunn

We are proud to have Web Hosting and Rack Housing from 9 Net Avenue Deutschland.
(16)