rec.puzzles.crosswords

Date Index

PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Flying Tortoise
- Re: PVPCWC 48 - 32 Hour Warning, Flying Tortoise
In a sorry state, Rishi
- Re: In a sorry state, Flying Tortoise
- Re: In a sorry state, Steven Gibbs
- Re: In a sorry state, Dave Baker
  - Re: In a sorry state, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: In a sorry state, Dave Baker
Three Down, Martin Willett
Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Offramp
- Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Peter Biddlecombe
- Re: Plagiarism in crossword puzzles - has it ever occurred?, Mark Brader
Don't understand answer., whileurup
- Re: Don't understand answer., Dave Baker
  - Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Don't understand answer., MMCL
- Re: Don't understand answer., Ed Enstrom
  - Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Don't understand answer., Flying Tortoise
    - Re: Don't understand answer., Peter T. Daniels
ACC 228 - The result, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC 228 - The result, Vari L. Cinicke
ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Jeremy C B Nicoll
- Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Mark Brader
- Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Steve Ball
  - Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Andrew B.
  - Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Andrew B.
    - Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - The Analysis, Steve Ball
- ACC 228 - postscript, Mark Iredell
  - Re: ACC 228 - postscript, Jeremy C B Nicoll
Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Mark Brader
- Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    - Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    - Re: Merv Griffin's Crosswords, Peter T. Daniels
Rules and Regulations, John K Masters
- Re: Rules and Regulations, Flying Tortoise
  - Re: Rules and Regulations, Derek Wills
    - Re: Rules and Regulations, Rishi
    - Re: Rules and Regulations, Flying Tortoise
- Re: Rules and Regulations, Peter Biddlecombe
  - Re: Rules and Regulations, Rishi
  - Re: Rules and Regulations, John K Masters
  - Re: Rules and Regulations, Gail Koontz
Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
- Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Flying Tortoise
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter Biddlecombe
  - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, vinyl1
    - Re: Times 23,764 - I just knew it!, Peter T. Daniels
ACC 228 - the clues, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC 228 - the clues, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
SCWC44 - entries only, Flying Tortoise
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
    - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, MMCL
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Mark Brader
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Angus Rodgers
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Mark Iredell
  - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Rishi
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Phil Rose
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Ian Woodrow
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Angus Rodgers
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Vari L. Cinicke
  - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, robkingston
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Pete Maclean
  - Re: SCWC44 - entries only, Duke
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, John K Masters
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, MMCL
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, vinyl1
- Re: SCWC44 - entries only, google
SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Flying Tortoise
- Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Andrew B.
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Uncle Yap
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
- Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Angus Rodgers
  - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Rishi
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: SCWC44 - comments and bonus clues for discussion, Flying Tortoise
5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Ian Woodrow
- Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, henri
- Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Dave Baker
- Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Old Timer
  - Re: 5th December Glasgow Herald - misprinted clue, Ian Woodrow
Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?, Ian Woodrow
- Re: Whatever happened to PVPCWC?, Peter Biddlecombe
The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Vari L. Cinicke
- Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Vari L. Cinicke
  - Re: The Doubles Devolution continues Apace! :-(, Angus Rodgers
A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Frangipani
- Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Uncle Yap
- Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: A bit non-PC for Guardian?, Frangipani
Re: Nov 29th Glasgow Herald, Ian Woodrow
SCWC 44: looking ahead, Rishi
- Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead, Rishi
  - Re: SCWC 44: looking ahead, Flying Tortoise
SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
- Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
  - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
  - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Steve Ball
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Uncle Yap
  - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
  - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, phh
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Rishi
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Phil Rose
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Brian Skinner
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: SCWC 43: the winner, Flying Tortoise
WaPo Style Invitational Week 742: Clue Us In, Mark Iredell
ACC228 - an example or two, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: ACC228 - an example or two, Phil Rose
Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
- Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Michael Peake
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, mUs1Ka
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
- Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Andrew B.
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Pete Maclean
  - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Vari L. Cinicke
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Father Ignatius
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, phh
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Chris Lear
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Angus Rodgers
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, rthearle@xxxxxxxxxxx
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Pete Maclean
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Magpie 'A' Grade Puzzle Isn't Easy!, Dr Ivan D. Reid
Re: ACC 228 - A spot of Brunch!, Flying Tortoise
ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
- Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
  - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, ebunn
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
    - Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, ebunn
- Re: ACC 228 - is there anybody out there?, Flying Tortoise
From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Jordan
- Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Dave Baker
- Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Brian Skinner
  - Re: From The Nation Puzzle No. 3106, Dave Baker
SCWC 43: clue list, Rishi
- <Possible follow-ups>
- SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
  - Re: SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
    - Re: SCWC 43: Clue list, Angus Rodgers
- SCWC 43: Clue list, Rishi
Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
- Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
  - Re: Times no, 23,758, Uncle Yap
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Uncle Yap
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
  - Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter T. Daniels
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Peter Biddlecombe
    - Re: Times no, 23,758, Brian
  - Re: Times no, 23,758, vinyl1
  - Re: Times no, 23,758, Father Ignatius
- Re: Times no, 23,758, Phil Rose
Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0, Angus Rodgers
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Magpie magazine - 60.5 for 0, colin . blackburn
PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!), Flying Tortoise
- Re: PVPCWC 48 (in double quick time!), Flying Tortoise
Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, ebunn
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
  - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Mark Brader
    - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
    - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Mark Brader
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Flying Tortoise
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Dave Baker
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Father Ignatius
  - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, henri
    - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Father Ignatius
    - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Peter Biddlecombe
- Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Phil Rose
  - Re: November 28th Glasgow Herald -- unusually hard?, Jim Tait