Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: "Steve B." <prettygood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:18:51 GMT
The Last Danish Pastry said:
"Steve B." <prettygood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>news:C0360C9B.6F726%prettygood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote in message
..
Jonathan Buss said:
Steve B. wrote:
Jonathan Buss said:
Peter T. Daniels wrote:
Brian Smith wrote:
Can anyone say with any real degree of confidence whether the
setter is
expecting STEEL or STEAL as the answer to this clue?
"To rob reportedly requires nerve(5)"
If the fourth letter isn't checked, this is a defective clue. If
it were
"To rob reportedly nerve is required," it would clearly be
STEAL.
Similarly, "Reportedly, to rob requires nerve" is STEEL.
PTD's first example has the same problem as the original clue.
It would have to be something like "To rob requires nerve,
reportedly".
Somebody help me. I don't see the problem. Surely the clue parses
as
"[wordplay] requires [definition]" How else can you accommodate
"requires"?
Therefore, 'reportedly" can only refer to "To rob". It would
properly be
written as "To rob, reportedly...", but even Ximenes allowed
missing (as
opposed to additional, misleading) punctuation.
Steve = : ^ )
In the surface reading, "reportedly" modifies "requires"
True...but that's less than irrelevant to the cryptic reading.
Here's how it looks to me:
To rob = STEAL
reportedly = homophone indicator => STEEL
requires = link to...
nerve = definition = STEEL
I see no ambiguity, nor any other problem. The answer is STEEL.
But just moving "= definition" gives us:
============================================
To rob = definition = STEAL
reportedly = homophone indicator => STEEL
requires = link to...
nerve = STEEL
============================================
I see no ambiguity, nor any other problem. The answer is STEAL.
The problem is that, in your parsing, the homophone indicator is on the
wrong side of the link. The homophone indicator is part of the wordplay. The
link links the wordplay and the definition. I don't think that:
"[Definition] [homophone indicator] requires [homophone fodder]" is a valid
clue structure. I have no problem with:
"[Homophone fodder] [homophone indicator] requires [definition]" - except
that '"requires" is perhaps a bit ambitious; but it is clearly the link.
Steve = : ^ )
.
- References:
- Ambiguous clue?
- From: Brian Smith
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: Peter T. Daniels
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: Jonathan Buss
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: Steve B.
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: Jonathan Buss
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: Steve B.
- Re: Ambiguous clue?
- From: The Last Danish Pastry
- Ambiguous clue?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ambiguous clue?
- Next by Date: Re: Ambiguous clue?
- Previous by thread: Re: Ambiguous clue?
- Next by thread: Re: Ambiguous clue?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading