Re: Big cat really quite small

On May 14, 12:36 am, "Alienjones" <alienjo...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I told ColinD the image I sent him was from a composite... Some 2 years
after you started your pedantic bull*** and the Alan Browne saga. What's
up? You have a problem with honesty? I also told him the size of the
composite ... Fuching WALL FILLING. His print equaled one frame of a 20D.
More truth so put your hands over your ears to stop them burning.

The REAL truth:
Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.35mm, aus.photo
From: Colin_D <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 23:21:29 +1300
Subject: Re: Panorama software (Which do you use)

Declaration to all readers of this thread:

At no time did Douglas send, nor did I receive, a RAW file of the
print he sent me.

By his own statement, he made a 24x72 inch panorama from twenty
stitched images. He now wants us to believe that the 24x36 print
he
sent me, the
right-hand half of the pano, was from a single frame? Like, 19
frames
used in the other half?

Douglas appears to have serious reality problems. His word is not
to
be trusted.

Colin D.

ROFL!

Come on, Douggie, time to fess up. You've been lying again.
Hey, while you're coming clean I just gotta ask you about the main pic
on this site (that you supposedly have me blocked from viewing ....
LOL!):

http://www.douglasjames.com.au/

That's really a guy in drag isn't it? Is that the lovely Julian?




.