Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- From: Alan Browne <alan.browne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 10:11:17 -0400
Joseph Kewfi wrote:
I found this on the web a couple years ago and like its simple common
sense. The scary things are:
1. There is nowhere near a "100 year" supply of oil identified.
2. The growth rate in consumption is greater than 5%
This from the guy who lectures others about OT postings! Whats wrong Al, the
group getting too quiet for ya? bloody troublemaker ;-]
I apologize if this subject, or OT's offend you. I've gotten very frustrated over people's attitudes regarding energy consumption of late. I know my little campaign will have little or no net effect, but it does feel good and it's cheaper than therapy.
Cheers,
Alan
--
-- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm
-- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm
-- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin
-- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- From: Joseph Kewfi
- Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- References:
- OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- From: Alan Browne
- Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- From: Joseph Kewfi
- OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- Prev by Date: Re: WAS: Nikon Afficionado's New Release Due When?? - who has announced 16 MP sensors?
- Next by Date: Re: Grey Market Question.
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Supply side solution for oil energy bound to fail.
- Index(es):