Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: sportsphotoman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 2 Mar 2006 14:13:32 -0800
uraniumcommittee@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
John McWilliams wrote:
<< Snipped bits out >>
It's more the lack of trimming replies that's annoying. Or using a
newsreader that doesn't understand a sig delimiter and chop off the
signature line.
The arguments pro and con bottom posting are endless (thanks to Gates),
and if one can't be bothered to take a bit more time to make it easier
for *others* to read/respond to posts, well, then, one can't be bothered.
I use Google Groups. The quoted text is hidden unless you click on it.
Try using that service.
All right. I'm now posting from Google. First time. It appears as
though everything is qouted. Yes, there is a single line space at the
top, but the bottom is emminently scrollable and postable.
One's MMV.
--
John McWilliams
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- References:
- OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: Matt Clara
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: John McWilliams
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: uraniumcommittee
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: John McWilliams
- Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- From: uraniumcommittee
- OT: ben franklin on trolls
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- Next by Date: Re: a "normal" lens
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- Next by thread: Re: OT: ben franklin on trolls
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading